Curufinwe
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2013
- 55,848
- 42,950
The deal I was referring too was: Drouin + Suzuki for Werenski + 2ndDomi + 1st/good prospect for Werenski is a very decent offer.
Domi is young, plays center, and is producing like a first liner. Saying he gets only Nutivaara/Murray is ridiculous. What are the expectations here? Barkov? Hischier? Aho? Monahan? Larkin?
Werenski alone does not get these types of franchise C.
Barkov is reaching too far. Maybe Aho also. The rest would indeed be in the conversation.Domi + 1st/good prospect for Werenski is a very decent offer.
Domi is young, plays center, and is producing like a first liner. Saying he gets only Nutivaara/Murray is ridiculous. What are the expectations here? Barkov? Hischier? Aho? Monahan? Larkin?
Werenski alone does not get these types of franchise C.
I would do Roslovic, a first, and a third.
When we say "young center", we kind of mean someone who's a top 1-2 center right now, not a third line winger who still might have some hope of becoming a center someday. Hometown affiliation does not improve on-ice capability.I would do Roslovic, a first, and a third.
Winnipeg would need to unload a contract to take on another high paid RFA. How about Roslovic, 1st and Kulikov or Perrault.
Maybe people have given up to sell him as a center.I'm amazed I've read through a few pages of this thread and didn't see Willie Nylander's name.
League maximum. Maybe.What offer sheet would CBJ not match ?
Larkin scored 73 in 76 games last year and is already inching into the selke conversation, werenskis a great player, but he doesn't get larkin either.Barkov is reaching too far. Maybe Aho also. The rest would indeed be in the conversation.
Top pairing Dmen (top20 per NHL) are worth 60-70pt centers. It's fine if you are high on Larkin, and believe his defensive game makes him =/< than other Centers; and don't want to trade him.Larkin scored 73 in 76 games last year and is already inching into the selke conversation, werenskis a great player, but he doesn't get larkin either.
Top pairing Dmen (top20 per NHL) are worth 60-70pt centers. It's fine if you are high on Larkin, and believe his defensive game makes him =/< than other Centers; and don't want to trade him.
To everyone else:
CBJ doesn't need defensive centers, it's not a requirement that your offer includes selke candidates, but they do have to be above 60-70 points and relatively young centers.
And so are defensemen who score 10+g 40points their 1st 3years while being good enough defensively that Torts has him on the top pairing.Do you have some example players here? Werenski is great but you are describing a young 1C that is pretty valuable and there just aren't that many in the league. Most teams that have one are going to want to hold onto them unless they somehow have an excess....this seems pretty rare.
I tend to think that Werenski is being underestimated. I think it’s hard to come to an agreement on 1 for 1 trades involve players of his caliber, but a 21 year old top pair defenseman returns a similar aged top line center. There just aren’t a lot of either type of player thought to be available.
Do you have some example players here? Werenski is great but you are describing a young 1C that is pretty valuable and there just aren't that many in the league. Most teams that have one are going to want to hold onto them unless they somehow have an excess....this seems pretty rare.
Yeah, except I'd want to aim a little bit higher than the Preds did in a Werenski deal, thus my flinching at names like Horvat and Trocheck.Obvious one is Johansen for Jones
Yeah, except I'd want to aim a little bit higher than the Preds did in a Werenski deal, thus my flinching at names like Horvat and Trocheck.
How much to sign Werenski though? Going by some of the trade offers it is going to be expensive. Karlsson just signed long term for 11.5 millionI wouldn’t want to move ZW but I’m intrigued as to what other fan bases think he is worth.