japhi
Registered User
- Jul 7, 2014
- 3,737
- 3,076
Or defensemen. Point stands, they had a guy that filled a need, surprised they couldn’t make it work. We are talking 3.5, you can always make that work if willingThey didn't have cap space then.
Or defensemen. Point stands, they had a guy that filled a need, surprised they couldn’t make it work. We are talking 3.5, you can always make that work if willingThey didn't have cap space then.
Don’t disagree, but maybe they didn’t realize the impact guys like that have a year ago mow and realized if they’re gonna go for it they need this type of playerStrange that the Jets wouldn’t give Chiarot 3.5 a few years ago and just paid 2 seconds and 3.9 for a comparable. Not ideal asset management
I'm the 10 years the Jets have been here via 2.0 we've never drafted a top 4 D outside the first or second round. Some good depth FWDs but D scouting is an issueDon't care about the picks but we really need NHL caliber D in our lineup now. We draft well enough outside the 1st/2nd rounds so we always seem to find NHL players anyways but this gives us a need now.
At that point they figured Byfuglien was coming back. But hindsight is 20/20Don’t disagree, but maybe they didn’t realize the impact guys like that have a year ago mow and realized if they’re gonna go for it they need this type of player
Or defensemen. Point stands, they had a guy that filled a need, surprised they couldn’t make it work. We are talking 3.5, you can always make that work if willing
If at that point they knew that Buff and his 7 million wouldn't be back they would have signed him in a second. Buff really screwed the Jets over. And hard.Ya, I don't think they were interested in Chiarot at that price. Maybe they regret that now, especially with Buff leaving
Fair enoughYa, I don't think they were interested in Chiarot at that price. Maybe they regret that now, especially with Buff leaving
When Cheveldayoff let Chiarot walk, we were looking at paying our top 4 ~$21M, and importantly didn't lack size on our D on account of having Byfuglien penciled in on our top pairing for at least two more years.Don’t disagree, but maybe they didn’t realize the impact guys like that have a year ago mow and realized if they’re gonna go for it they need this type of player
I don't think Savard is going to end up with that, him getting the same contract as Dillon (or a very similar one) seems pretty reasonable to me.
Why do you have everyone playing their off side?
Or defensemen. Point stands, they had a guy that filled a need, surprised they couldn’t make it work. We are talking 3.5, you can always make that work if willing
Strange that the Jets wouldn’t give Chiarot 3.5 a few years ago and just paid 2 seconds and 3.9 for a comparable. Not ideal asset management
Jets adding to their impressive collection of 2nd pairing defenseman.
They didn’t hAve the projected cap room to sign him. Remember there was this player named Buff that was on the books for $8mmStrange that the Jets wouldn’t give Chiarot 3.5 a few years ago and just paid 2 seconds and 3.9 for a comparable. Not ideal asset management
Yup. Classic win-win scenario. Caps clear space that they needed and get positive assets when they were in a bind, Jets get a solid top 4 defenseman that is just what they needed locked up for the current window (of course, the Jets are already set up for their next window better than most teams) at a fair priceLove this trade for the Jets, exactly what they needed to be paired with Pionk, Dillon adds size, defensive minded and physical/nasty. Fair return for the Caps also.
Or defensemen. Point stands, they had a guy that filled a need, surprised they couldn’t make it work. We are talking 3.5, you can always make that work if willing
Why would the Jets trade Copp?
Why? Vanecek was better pick lmao.Also, Seattle should have been all over picking up Dillon and flipping him for a couple 2nds.
Overpayment on Winnipeg's end. Chevy could do better things with those two seconds.