For comparison's sake here are the forward lines I've been considering:
Lehkonen - Saarela - Kapanen
Ikonen - Vähätalo - Rantanen
Hintz - Mustonen - Puljujärvi
Lammikko - Rauhala - Ojamäki
Kinnunen
This gives us more of a 1A-1B-1C situation, which when properly used can be a big asset. It also keeps the connections I previously mentioned intact.
Talking about past connections which could be useful: Mustonen has played with both Hintz and Ikonen so that could be one line. Rantanen has played with both Vähätalo and Lammikko so that could be another line. Aho-Kalapudas-Puljujärvi have played a lot together in Kärpät and that line worked well in Jönköping. And then there's the line you already mentioned; Lehkonen-Saarela-Kapanen. Kapanen and Lehkonen know each other from KalPa, and Saarela has at least briefly played with Kapanen in the past.
If Puljujärvi makes the team there's a good chance he plays the point on one of the two PP units.No. I just wanted to create 3 equal scoring lines, with no more than 1 midget in each line. Of course Ikonen/Kapanen would play over Puljujärvi in PP.