Prospect Info: Winnipeg Jets Prospects Thread 2018-19 - Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
57,427
29,287
Really encouraged by the comments on Samberg. For one thing, they indicate a pretty steep trajectory, considering where he was prior to last year. After 1.5 seasons of NCAA being pro ready or very near to it is a lot of progress. Even if that 'pro ready' comment meant AHL.

If he is AHL ready now could he reasonably be NHL ready by next Sept on that trajectory?
 
  • Like
Reactions: upperdeckjet

JetsFan815

Registered User
Jan 16, 2012
19,246
24,438
I saw someone comparing Samberg's stats to Jack Glover's in the previous "Prospects" thread, it's certainly an interesting case. I watched Samberg in last year's WJC and he looked great by my eyetest, I haven't watched the US-Slovakia game from yesterday but all the reviews about him were great, from Jets fans and non-Jets fan alike. Judging by his ice time in Game 1 and last year's WJC, Team USA coaches also love him too.

However, his PCS% (or his equivalent statistical model output that aims to project prospects' NHL potential based on available stats of past players) is probably pretty low by now. Josh Manson, Ryan McDonough and Brady Skjei are the only top-4 NHL d-men (although some Rangers will balk at Skjei being referred to as "top-4") that I can think of that were in the same ballpark stats wise at this stage in their NCAA careers.

I wonder what the reason is behind his NCAA numbers, is it just icetime?
 

ps241

The Ballad of Ville Bobby
Sponsor
Mar 10, 2010
34,904
31,383
I saw someone comparing Samberg's stats to Jack Glover's in the previous "Prospects" thread, it's certainly an interesting case. I watched Samberg in last year's WJC and he looked great by my eyetest, I haven't watched the US-Slovakia game from yesterday but all the reviews about him were great, from Jets fans and non-Jets fan alike. Judging by his ice time in Game 1 and last year's WJC, Team USA coaches also love him too.

However, his PCS% (or his equivalent statistical model output that aims to project prospects' NHL potential based on available stats of past players) is probably pretty low by now. Josh Manson, Ryan McDonough and Brady Skjei are the only top-4 NHL d-men (although some Rangers will balk at Skjei being referred to as "top-4") that I can think of that were in the same ballpark stats wise at this stage in their NCAA careers.

I wonder what the reason is behind his NCAA numbers, is it just icetime?

I am notmally a big fan of the PCS model but in this case I am going to defer to my eye test. I love how Samberg plays the game and it will transfer nicely to the NHL soon. He may not put up big points but he’s going to be a really solid D man for us.
 

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,075
33,132
I saw someone comparing Samberg's stats to Jack Glover's in the previous "Prospects" thread, it's certainly an interesting case. I watched Samberg in last year's WJC and he looked great by my eyetest, I haven't watched the US-Slovakia game from yesterday but all the reviews about him were great, from Jets fans and non-Jets fan alike. Judging by his ice time in Game 1 and last year's WJC, Team USA coaches also love him too.

However, his PCS% (or his equivalent statistical model output that aims to project prospects' NHL potential based on available stats of past players) is probably pretty low by now. Josh Manson, Ryan McDonough and Brady Skjei are the only top-4 NHL d-men (although some Rangers will balk at Skjei being referred to as "top-4") that I can think of that were in the same ballpark stats wise at this stage in their NCAA careers.

I wonder what the reason is behind his NCAA numbers, is it just icetime?
It's partly a system thing at UMD, I think. Other than a small waterbug D like Perunovich, few young D in that program score much. But for me, just watching Samberg against the best of his age group shows that he has plenty of skill and a game fit for the NHL. For what it's worth, he now has 5 points in 8 WJHC-20 games, and he looked very involved and effective with the puck to me.
 

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
31,715
39,935
Winnipeg
Really encouraged by the comments on Samberg. For one thing, they indicate a pretty steep trajectory, considering where he was prior to last year. After 1.5 seasons of NCAA being pro ready or very near to it is a lot of progress. Even if that 'pro ready' comment meant AHL.

If he is AHL ready now could he reasonably be NHL ready by next Sept on that trajectory?
My guess/hope is he completes the year in the NCAA, spends next season on the Moose with a little spot duty as an injury replacement and then is ready for the big time the following season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10Ducky10

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,075
33,132
My guess/hope is he completes the year in the NCAA, spends next season on the Moose with a little spot duty as an injury replacement and then is ready for the big time the following season.
I would agree if the Jets weren't so thin on LD. He might be better than Chiarot by next season, and they'll need to move Kulikov for cap reasons. I think he might be able to make the jump...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
31,715
39,935
Winnipeg
I would agree if the Jets weren't so thin on LD. He might be better than Chiarot by next season, and they'll need to move Kulikov for cap reasons. I think he might be able to make the jump...
You need to take into account my dream of trading for Jake Muzzin at the TD to shore up the LHD this season and next ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
57,427
29,287
My guess/hope is he completes the year in the NCAA, spends next season on the Moose with a little spot duty as an injury replacement and then is ready for the big time the following season.

Yes, that is a more realistic expectation. But accepting the comments at face value indicates a trajectory that might have him playing at a higher level sooner. Some pretty solid observers are gushing. :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingBogo

ps241

The Ballad of Ville Bobby
Sponsor
Mar 10, 2010
34,904
31,383
Is there a feeling that he has higher upside than Niku ?

IMO Unless Niku improves his defense he will struggle to make the Jets as long as Maurice is coach. Paul is ok with guys that struggle as long as they are bigger. I don’t see Paul playing a small soft offensive D man like Niku over a guy like Stanley if he has a choice.

Sucks to be Sami but he is going to have to up his D game to make it based on how we roll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
57,427
29,287
I am notmally a big fan of the PCS model but in this case I am going to defer to my eye test. I love how Samberg plays the game and it will transfer nicely to the NHL soon. He may not put up big points but he’s going to be a really solid D man for us.

I think the PCS method will consistently identify good prospects. It won't necessarily identify the best prospects. It won't necessarily find all of the good prospects.

With Samberg, we are looking at a somewhat unconventional path to the NHL. We have a very small sample in the USHL where we can make good comparisons but the sample is so small that it is almost worthless. We are left with a total of 57 games in the NCAA and 8 games in the WJC. Not much really.

So far this year he is scoring at about the same rate as last year in NCAA. He might very well triple that rate for the rest of this season. With small samples, that wouldn't be too surprising.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ps241

garret9

AKA#VitoCorrelationi
Mar 31, 2012
21,738
4,380
Vancouver
www.hockey-graphs.com
It's partly a system thing at UMD, I think. Other than a small waterbug D like Perunovich, few young D in that program score much. But for me, just watching Samberg against the best of his age group shows that he has plenty of skill and a game fit for the NHL. For what it's worth, he now has 5 points in 8 WJHC-20 games, and he looked very involved and effective with the puck to me.

Jets really liked Perunovich. Too bad they didn't get him.
 

Whileee

Registered User
May 29, 2010
46,075
33,132
I would argue Samberg is a safer bet to have a long career as a top 4 defenseman, while Niku has a higher ceiling due to his offensive skills if he can ever figure out how to play consistently good hockey in his own zone.
Agree. Samberg seems like a surer bet for a long top-4 career, but Niku has higher end skill. I'd be happier if Niku was dominating more this season, but I suppose he might have some demotion malaise at this point.
 

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
31,715
39,935
Winnipeg
Agree. Samberg seems like a surer bet for a long top-4 career, but Niku has higher end skill. I'd be happier if Niku was dominating more this season, but I suppose he might have some demotion malaise at this point.
This has me a little worried. You'd really like him to get on his horse on with a mission to prove he is an NHL player. We saw that with Connor last season and it didn't take him long to cement himself as a top 6 winger when he got another shot.
 

Daximus

Wow, what a terrific audience.
Sponsor
Oct 11, 2014
39,185
25,410
Five Hills
This has me a little worried. You'd really like him to get on his horse on with a mission to prove he is an NHL player. We saw that with Connor last season and it didn't take him long to cement himself as a top 6 winger when he got another shot.

If it wasn't for a Matty P injury we might not have seen Connor at all at that point. I think it takes a bit more for a defencemen, especially an offensive defencemen to make a roster then a winger. Especially when they aren't getting PP time. Which is pretty much the spot you want to put your offensively minded D in. It's where guys like Ghost, Krug, Girard, Sergachev, Butcher, Lajoie really shine. Then eventually as they get more experience in the NHL they can take on bigger roles but until then, they are wasted if you aren't using them for their talents. Niku was 50/50 zone starts and was getting zero PP time. It's understandable when you are deep on the backend. But it's what he's good at. It's like having Vlasic on your team and never having him kill a penalty.
 

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
13,931
11,767
Is there a feeling that he has higher upside than Niku ?
I've always believed this.
6' 4" and 215 and 19 years old? I truly believe he is the best prospect we have right now including Vaseline.
Niku is a really offensive minded player but we have Buff, JMo and Trouba/Myers for O. I'd rather have a more defense-first type of D man. JMo, Samberg and Niku are a nice D corps on the left side. Too bad that #@$^# Trouba wants out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad