FireBall959
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2015
- 469
- 458
Check the boards for 1st time in a couple days, had to check dates of posts twice. Yep still talking about Medina!!! Man let it go, way past pathetic at this point. Smh
Old News.......Very Boring!Give yourself a pat on the back if ya feel the need since, for what was obvious to everyone else as well lol. I support that if you feel the need.
Heck I posted over a month ago it would work itself out as it should and knew it would also. Awesome insight. Just required patience.
Your the only one that needed to post about it over 100x and continue to do so. Interesting, I'm not a psychology major but......
Can you tell us why your first choice in X wasn't given a chance this year? Not a coach was wrong in hindsight answer but the reason they cut ties and he wasn't given an op this year. You were very vocal about it for a long time this year.
Because you used incorrect info I will correct you regarding Medina and his playoff appearances.Wait didnt X play about 2 games in the playoffs???
Its time to let it go tho, really. Who even knows if O is still here??
As long as people keep responding after I said I am ready to move on ,I will keep going,takes 2 to tangle.Check the boards for 1st time in a couple days, had to check dates of posts twice. Yep still talking about Medina!!! Man let it go, way past pathetic at this point. Smh
That’s the thing. It takes 2. You stop and there is no tangling. You just keep dragging it out.Because you used incorrect info I will correct you regarding Medina and his playoff appearances.
He appeared in 5 games total approximately 296 minutes finished with 3-2 record overall,2 -1 vs Flint,he came in Game 5 of that series replacing Onuska 34 minutes in with the score 3-2 Flint,Flint then added a goal to make it 4-2,then Windsor later scored to make it 4-3,Spits lost the game but Medina because he allowed 1 goal and then Windsor scored a goal he got tagged with the loss even though Windsor never tied game up,he got tagged with the loss,if they dont score a goal that game Onuska gets the loss not Medina.
Medina and Windsor go on to win game 6 and 7 to take the Western Conference and go up against Hamilton where Medina went 1-1 against them,allowing 6 in the 2 games,Onuska took over in game 3 after a loss in game 2,and Medina never saw the net again,and Onuska went 2-3 in the series as Hamilton moved on to the Mem Cup.
Medina wound up in those 5 games an average of 2.03 and a save percentage of .936
Which is why I always say without both goalies performing Windsor does not win the Western Conference and to the finals against Hamilton, that is the part that gets me due credit not given.
As long as people keep responding after I said I am ready to move on ,I will keep going,takes 2 to tangle.
That’s the thing. It takes 2. You stop and there is no tangling. You just keep dragging it out.
Actually I am not the only one,as soon as I write moving on someone makes a comment or a snarky remark.That’s the thing. It takes 2. You stop and there is no tangling. You just keep dragging it out.
As an impartial observer, you make more snarky comments then any other poster on the board.Actually I am not the only one,as soon as I write moving on someone makes a comment or a snarky remark.
I won't let it pass period
From here on in I wont start but I will comment and respond if someone initiates.
As long as people keep responding after I said I am ready to move on ,I will keep going,takes 2 to tangle.
Windsor has a history of goaltenders disappearing. We even had one quit in midgame.Wait didnt X play about 2 games in the playoffs???
Its time to let it go tho, really. Who even knows if O is still here??
Windsor has a history of goaltenders disappearing. We even had one quit in midgame.
Actually I am not the only one,as soon as I write moving on someone makes a comment or a snarky remark.
I won't let it pass period
From here on in I wont start but I will comment and respond if someone initiates.
Tell me you pretend to be above the fray without telling me you're above the fray. You won't let it pass because you care about victory laps rather than discussion.Actually I am not the only one,as soon as I write moving on someone makes a comment or a snarky remark.
I won't let it pass period
From here on in I wont start but I will comment and respond if someone initiates.
If we are all here to discuss hockey,what gives you the right to lecture to someone you disagree with and insult and keep the pot boiling,all because you dont like the use of analytical info to back up a particular point of view.That's right. You fight to get the last word in and keep educating the stubborn, know nothing masses. The condescending "I'll correct you" "I'm sorry you feel that way" probly doesn't help, That and obsessive repetition of stats and thoughts.....
We are all here to discuss hockey. No need to try and convince people you are better, smarter.......esp considering the 10 yr track record of your posts. You let emotion cloud judgement n posts. ( and it's funny when the shoe is on another foot you will argue the exact opposite) I won't bore the masses with all the examples of the 180s.
But calling others heartless and not caring of others is.....If we are all here to discuss hockey,what gives you the right to lecture to someone you disagree with and insult and keep the pot boiling,all because you dont like the use of analytical info to back up a particular point of view.
Different point of views are one thing,but using words such as obsessive is disrespectful and disgraceful.
Your choice, talk hockey not insults
I wont let it pass because I refused to be bullied online,nothing about victory laps,Well the reason for how few OAs are claimed on waivers, and even goalies is all about supply and demand.
60 teams in the CHL
180 OAs allowed
120 goalies, maybe add a couple more goalies that play a handful of games
Medina didn't get claimed because there was no market or demand for him. That doesn't preclude a team from claiming him though.
Tell me you pretend to be above the fray without telling me you're above the fray. You won't let it pass because you care about victory laps rather than discussion.
If we are all here to discuss hockey,what gives you the right to lecture to someone you disagree with and insult and keep the pot boiling,all because you dont like the use of analytical info to back up a particular point of view.
Different point of views are one thing,but using words such as obsessive is disrespectful and disgraceful.
Your choice, talk hockey not insults
Nice to see your last comment or lineIt is obsessive. You are probly at 150 posts on 1 subject no one is as invested in as you lol. Thats a fact not disgraceful or disrespectful lol.
This is funny. Analyrics lol. Keep reaching.Too easy, so I'll let your attempt at a dig pass on by and won't respond further until you attack again. Just following your lead
Most on here see the common denominator with the BS.
Get the feeling both Morneau and Abraham will still be out of the lineupSooo... Erie on Thursday.
But you bully more then anyone?I wont let it pass because I refused to be bullied online,nothing about victory laps,
When I say let's move on people like you pile on how is that productive.
Welcome to the forumBut you bully more then anyone?
however u have moved on....Welcome to the forum
How is that for bullying?
We are here to talk hockey
Too bad u cant respect that
Is that you talking hockey or carrying onhowever u have moved on....
throwing rocks in glass houses again?...Is that you talking hockey or carrying on
I wont let it pass because I refused to be bullied online,nothing about victory laps,
When I say let's move on people like you pile on how is that productive.
Go back 3 pages sir. Stop being blinded by emotion lol. More hockey n Spits talk from me than the 1 subject, repetitive stats you post. How many have called you out in the last 2 days? Last week? Last month? But ya it's everyone else. Facepalm emoji.Nice to see your last comment or line
Continue with the insults
One of these days you will talk about hockey
Nice to see we are talking about hockey on this siteBullied? It's a 2 way street sir. You are more involved with it in an attacking condescending manner more than any1 I've seen post. And it's been confirmed by so many on here. Hockey people, Spits fans n nuetral observers but sure play that card.
Bullied? Wanna share your PMs you attacked me with 2 weeks ago? I didn't insult you becore your redponse. I challenged your BS pist not the oerson. and I posted n public. You jumped into my PM To try n bully in tryvto intimidate so no one else would see i but it didn't work. And it's saved. Then you whined about it on here.
Look in the mirror. You made your bed with me and so many others.
I gotta 100 examples of hypocrisy, bullying, absolutely terrible and incorrect emotional takes on your end but haven't posted outta respect for the board and concern. for you as a person.
I've even reached out to posters who I know you get along with concerned about you in spite of your attacks. That was showing genuine concern for you as a person.
You as a poster.......I wont dip to your level
Go back 3 pages sir. Stop being blinded by emotion lol. Much more hockey n Spits talk than the 1 subject, repetitive stats you pist. How many have called you out in the last 2 days? Last week? Last month. But ya it's everyone else. Facepalm emoji.