RayzorIsDull
Registered User
My problem with Thompson was he held back and played a very defensive game with an offensively talented roster. For the tourney it wasn't just the players that received help, the coaches did too. He also played to the strengths of the team during the tourney which made a huge difference. Anytime he did that during the season the team was dominant most games. He did that in the playoffs and built a 3 - 1 series lead, switched back to that defensive style that suffocated his own team's offensive game and lost the series. That was my issue with Thompson, he didn't fully utilize the team's strengths and Letowski was the same way which is where my concerns are with Smith.
Nothing against him but I don't want to see him play it safe and follow what he learned from those two.
Let him become his own coach, at a lower level. He can see what works from what he knows as well as what works works with a new coach while also developing his own ideas.
Would love nothing more if Wellwood came in for three years then went pro and Smith had the chance to build some success in LaSalle based on his thoughts away from the Spits spotlight after Letowski and Thompson have both moved on and Smith is the only carry over. If he struggles in Windsor fans will turn on him faster than they did Letowski and Thompson.
Develop him in the right situation.
It hasn't all been bad, it's been a lot of inconsistency that has hurt the team.
Sanctions were what they were. You pay a price for what went on. The problem was Rychel didn't take a step back with the sanctions in place, he was a kid in a candy store when Kerby was here. Every deal that returned assets needed to be made but spending them as soon as he brought assets in or spending big on a defected player when he had minimal assets was the problem.
He needed to step back for a season to evaluate things and he didn't which ultimately led to having to trade Kerby instead of winning a title when he was here.
It was great to see them win the tourney here, they earned it the tourney and the rules allow for it so no asterisk but until you accept that without the hosting they would have no post season success since 2011.
No one is upset they won within the rules but where you the disrespect is because you hold onto that final result while others simply point out they wouldn't have had a shot if they didn't host. After they were knocked thankfully they hosted and had the second chance and outplayed everyone to win it. Everyone agrees with you about winning it but they push back because they acknowledge it took the second chance to win it where you seem to ignore that part.
Yes you and I disagree, vehently on a lot of things but we have respect and we've met and discussed things face to face. That probably helps with the mutual respect. If you saw some comments for what they were and always a direct shot at you you would find many of those you disagree with actually are closer to your thoughts than you realize.
I'll keep challenging you as I know you will do the same with me and that's a good thing. This board would really suck if we all agreed on everything. Here's to more heated debates.
Good post. I still believe at this point the tipping point is whether or not Windsor gets Foudy back. I still have questions on D you have experience in Ladd/Henault, one has large injury concerns. After that game experience for the D drops precipitously Renwick has 77 career games, Sobolov, Ride, DeAngelis have not played an OHL game yet, Robinson has 63 games. I like Medina and he deserves credit for unseating Piiroinen with that being said Medina will need to be much better for this team to contend.