FireBall959
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2015
- 469
- 458
Brown and Vilardi were off about thw same time. One had surgery and probably had to take it easy to get healed, one had a sore wrist. Can you tell which one was which.
Agreed - best period of hockey they played all year - problem was it was the 3rd period after they laid an egg in the first 2 periods. Rocky needs to have them play like that for 60 minutes, easier said then done I'm sure but it has to change. They have not put together a solid game in their last 4. The talent is there - they showed that in the third - just need to hit the ground running at the start of the first. Kitchener played a great road game and it was goaltending that stole it for them in the 3rd.finally get a home game and all we get to see is one period.
why cant we play the entire game like the third period? This team isnt good enough to be taking periods off
The offensive ineptitude continues. Warren better find some guys who can put the puck in the net or this team won't get out of the first round. They have a hard enough time scrapping by the bottom feeders of the league.
I understand there have been a lot of accolades for how the Spits have played on the road but meanwhile the Hounds have been playing 16-1-1 hockey over their past 18. I
I've never understood comparisons like this. Windsor had a fantastic road trip, all things considered. That's period. The Hounds playing phenomenal hockey takes nothing away from what Windsor has done. If you win 750k and someone else wins 1M, do you shrug because they won more? No, they're both outstanding. Yes, it means Windsor has to continue winning but that's likely to happen. I don't see SSM going 16-1-1 over every 18-game period.
So Windsor is likely to keep winning ( you say this is "likely") but the Soo is not? Why Ohltg? Id like to jear ypur reasoning for this statement.
When your in direct competition with them, ya you take it into account, "all things considered"
Esp when youve only played an extra couple roads games as mentioned above in the thread. And the road trip to the Soo is tougher than then toWindsor for most teams.
So Windsor is likely to keep winning ( you say this is "likely") but the Soo is not? Why Ohltg? Id like to jear ypur reasoning for this statement.
Interesting considering the Soo will get Speers back.
Which is more likely - Windsor continuing at an 8-2-4 pace or SSM's 16-1-1 pace?
That's what I was referring to. Windsor has the team to continue playing hockey at that pace, or better, given they'll get a full roster sometime in the next couple of weeks (minus Carter, maybe). SSM won't be 16-1-1 every 18 games. They'll fall to reality at some point.
OHLTG and Rayzor both sound very confident in their chosen teams. Rayzor with the Hounds, OHLTG with his home town Spitfires. You guys need to sack up and bet on this. The loser leaves the Spits board for 2017/18.
That would make this race a lot more exciting for the rest of us. I think you guys are all talk so I don't expect anything to come of this challenge. And no Rayzor you can't just post as Windsor7 in the Windsor thread if the Hounds don't come through for you.
OHLTG and Rayzor both sound very confident in their chosen teams. Rayzor with the Hounds, OHLTG with his home town Spitfires. You guys need to sack up and bet on this. The loser leaves the Spits board for 2017/18
I know who Windsor7 is, if OHLTG thinks hard he can figure it out as well.
So the Spits lost a game to a fairly decent opponent last night. Big deal but don't try to blame it on an extended road trip. People are making it out to be 40 days in the WILDERNESS. They played road games yes but they returned home after every 2-3 games and probably spent more time in Windsor each week than on the road.
I see that WR, according to the Star, wants to pick up 2 forwards or at least 1. I hope that's just for public consumption because if that's all he gets done this will remain a good team, not the team to beat.
My opinion still remains ...the Spits need 2 Forwards ( a top 3 & a top 6), a #4 Dman and a backup goalie. Will that be easily accomplished, hell no, but IMHO that's what they need.
You can bet yer sweet azz that the other top teams will be adding top talent and one way or another we'd better keep up....
Rayzor
You say Spits should add a D,and with the McEneny,Nother and Burns as the 4,5,6 not good enough to win championship or Mem Cup,u honestly think London without Mete,SSM without White,and Erie without Raddysh would win, hardly think so, Hounds with Calvados,Demeo and Liguerre, London, Bouchard,Nattinen Golden,and Erie with Fergus, Byrne and Wainman is hardly inspiring.
Most unbiased hockey people would take Sergachev ahead of the teams best dman anyways, however only comparison purposes only used.
Windsor's need is a forward or 2, not a D,not that I would one down,our competition especially the Hounds need help on the D,more then Windsor.
HL: You forgot Juolevi (London).
Just sayin'...
Didn't forget Juolevi,the discussion was bottom 3 -D brought forward by
Rayzor,
Mete, Juolevi, Crawley, London's top 3, Sergachev, Day, Chatfield, Windsor's
It was, McEneny,Nother,Burns,and comparison to other teams Bottom 3, taking out Sergachev,Mete, Raddysh and White.
Rayzor
You say Spits should add a D,and with the McEneny,Nother and Burns as the 4,5,6 not good enough to win championship or Mem Cup,u honestly think London without Mete,SSM without White,and Erie without Raddysh would win, hardly think so, Hounds with Calvados,Demeo and Liguerre, London, Bouchard,Nattinen Golden,and Erie with Fergus, Byrne and Wainman is hardly inspiring.
Most unbiased hockey people would take Sergachev ahead of the teams best dman anyways, however only comparison purposes only used.
Windsor's need is a forward or 2, not a D,not that I would one down,our competition especially the Hounds need help on the D,more then Windsor.
OK. I see.
Could it be that Rocky decided to focus on "defence first" given all the injuries up front--to hold the fort, so to speak, until he had a full lineup? I think the Spits have been exceptional in that department. Number one in goals against.
Agree re the need for a forward or 2,
Definitely disagreement about a need for a #4d, Sergachev,Day, Chatfield and Stanley are the best foursome in the O,imo,add Dipietro and there is a reason the team's#1 in team defense and goaltending in the league.No need to get experienced backup either,all the others don't have them,we don't one either.