Boruto
.
- Jun 27, 2011
- 15,627
- 436
it's behindthenet.ca. You have to be Canadian to gain access to the remaining information.
Will Anton Stralman emerge as the #4 defenseman this year?
- Thread starter Josh3217
- Start date
it's behindthenet.ca. You have to be Canadian to gain access to the remaining information.
Thirty One
Safe is safe.
- Dec 28, 2003
- 28,981
- 24,354
Unclick top opponents and opponents details and make top linemates and linemates details checkmarks.
The Lunatic Fridge
why is my name here?
Considering all the injuries MDZ has gone through it would not be the least surprising to see stralman playing better.
Boruto
.
- Jun 27, 2011
- 15,627
- 436
To join the Michael Del Zotto club, please call 1-888-MDZ-BEST to receive your complimentary key chain.
Gardner McKay
RIP, Jimmy.
No kidding. The guy was terribad in Columbus though. Considering Jersey didn't have the most spectacular defense I was shocked when they didn't offer him a spot (despite how bad he was in Columbus) and I was petrified when we signed him. However, he has been such a fantastic surprise. Considering how much Torts relied on the defense and he still played to the level he did, speaks volumes about how far he has come.
The Lunatic Fridge
why is my name here?
Boruto
.
- Jun 27, 2011
- 15,627
- 436
Can't tell if sarcastic post for haters or just some sort of troll post..
yes.
aufheben
#Norris4Fox
Callagraves
Block shots
- Jan 24, 2011
- 6,373
- 2
vipernsx
Flatus Expeller
- Sep 4, 2005
- 6,791
- 3
vipernsx
Flatus Expeller
- Sep 4, 2005
- 6,791
- 3
Yeah trade the bum, he's terrible. Rangers need zero PMD defensemen!
Chimpradamus
Registered User
For as long as Del Zotto continues to play with his head in a bucket, Strålman looks like our #4 D, yes.
Crease
Chief Justice of the HFNYR Court
- Jul 12, 2004
- 24,183
- 25,884
Most defensemen peak between 28-32. Del Zotto is 23. He's got plenty of time to put together his game. Whats funny is that whenever he approaches "I-want-to-grab-him-by-the-neck" levels, he makes a killer homerun pass that sends a guy on a breakaway.
So: there is a really good chance Strålman will be the better player for the next five years then..
Jabroni
The People's Champ
- Jun 1, 2008
- 7,522
- 168
Agreed. He is definitely inconsistent, but when DZ is on, he's a better overall defenseman than Stralman.
In any sport, consistency is one of the best qualities to have with any player. Since Stralman is consistently solid, he's our number as of now.
Fitzy
Very Stable Genius
- Jan 29, 2009
- 35,206
- 22,087
I just think Del Zotto would be able to develop much more comfortably from the third pairing and 2nd PP unit, where the expectations are lower and he isn't facing top 6 forwards.
You get a good relationship with he and Moore going and it could work for a long time. Staal-Stralman and McD-Girardi are already proven tandems.
You get a good relationship with he and Moore going and it could work for a long time. Staal-Stralman and McD-Girardi are already proven tandems.
Blue Blooded
Most people rejected his message
As a matter of fact I'd prefer Staal-Girardi and McD-Strålman.
(Healthy) Staal-Girardi works as well as McD-Girardi, but McD-Strålman was a lot better than Staal-Strålman.
If we disregard goal differentials due to sample size issues (although they speak heavily in favour of my argument) and only look at possession numbers this is how the pairings performed last year:
McD-Girardi: 51.1%
Staal-Girardi: 52.8%
Staal-Strålman: 55.5%
McD-Strålman: 60.9%
MDZ's results with McD/Staal for reference:
Staal-MDZ: 48.2%
McD-MDZ: 47.3%
LaffyTaffyNYR
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2012
- 17,113
- 2,662
I hope not, because that would show that Del Zotto is capable of playing the right side at a high level. Therefore, giving us one of it not the best D in the entire league with Moore/Stralman at the bottom pair.
So say we send John Moore to the right side this year
McDonagh-Girardi
Staal-Stralman
MDZ-Moore
Or
McDonagh-Girardi
Staal-Moore
MDZ-Stralman
Or
McDonagh-Moore
Staal-Girardi
MDZ-Stralman
?
The first seems the most likely of the three but the 2nd intrigues me.
Or will MDZ go right side and play with Staal?
McDonagh-Girardi
Staal-Stralman
MDZ-Moore
Or
McDonagh-Girardi
Staal-Moore
MDZ-Stralman
Or
McDonagh-Moore
Staal-Girardi
MDZ-Stralman
?
The first seems the most likely of the three but the 2nd intrigues me.
Or will MDZ go right side and play with Staal?
I know it is the "it thing" around here these days to be in love with Stralman, but people seem to be missing the fact that there is just as much of a chance that Stralman becomes the #7 as there is that he becomes the #4.
He was a journeyman who was laughed out of some pretty bad defensive teams before getting here. He failed in every system he played in before Torts' simplified system. Torts is gone, and if Strals is going to be a #4 D, his sheltered minutes will be gone as well. I want to see if he can keep up his play. Did he develop (finally) or did he just find the system that suits his abilities? I honestly don't know, and it will be interesting to watch.
Finally, a LOT depends on Dylan McIlrath. If McI makes the NHL team as a regular at some point this season, you can bet your ass he's going to be parked right next to MDZ. It's why they drafted him. They've had visions of MDZ/McI being a (very VERY) poor man's Leetch/Beukeboom reincarnation since that draft.
That gives a D-Corps of:
Staal/Girardi/McD/MDZ/McI---and one more guy. Personally, I would think Moore would be that guy before Strals.
Bottom line--Strals (like Eminger before him) is more likely to be fighting to make the bench by the end of the season than he will be the 2nd pair.
He was a journeyman who was laughed out of some pretty bad defensive teams before getting here. He failed in every system he played in before Torts' simplified system. Torts is gone, and if Strals is going to be a #4 D, his sheltered minutes will be gone as well. I want to see if he can keep up his play. Did he develop (finally) or did he just find the system that suits his abilities? I honestly don't know, and it will be interesting to watch.
Finally, a LOT depends on Dylan McIlrath. If McI makes the NHL team as a regular at some point this season, you can bet your ass he's going to be parked right next to MDZ. It's why they drafted him. They've had visions of MDZ/McI being a (very VERY) poor man's Leetch/Beukeboom reincarnation since that draft.
That gives a D-Corps of:
Staal/Girardi/McD/MDZ/McI---and one more guy. Personally, I would think Moore would be that guy before Strals.
Bottom line--Strals (like Eminger before him) is more likely to be fighting to make the bench by the end of the season than he will be the 2nd pair.
aufheben
#Norris4Fox
"They've had", or, you've had?
Stralman plays a very simple game, he'd be fine in any system. He's not the kind of player you can anchor a defense around, but put him on a decent team (i.e. NOT past Toronto, Columbus teams.), and, well he'll succeed.
Last edited:
Thirty One
Safe is safe.
- Dec 28, 2003
- 28,981
- 24,354
LaffyTaffyNYR
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2012
- 17,113
- 2,662
"They've had." I personally would prefer to see MDZ paired with a mobile defensive rock. McI will need someone to cover for him if he goes for the big hit--I think he would work best on a shut down pairing with someone like Staal. MDZ has always played his best hockey when lined up on the left side with a partner who could skate and focused on pure defense (see--MDZ/Sauer). If McD could play the right (has he ever been tried there? I can't remember seeing it), I would love to see MDZ/McD, Staal/McI, Moore/Girardi.
You say Stralman would be fine in any system. The problem with that is that he HASN'T been fine in any system. He's been awful in two systems, he couldn't even make the team in a 3rd system, and he was a great bottom pairing guy in Torts' system. None of those teams, including the Rangers, have ever tried to make him into an "anchor you can build a defense around." Not sure where you are getting that. My point is that people keep claiming he is this team's #4. He hasn't been that in his time here, and he's been far worse than that in his other NHL stops.
As I said, if an injury hits or if a couple of guys falter, he might get a chance to prove that he can be an NHL #4 D. I just think that it is AS likely that he finishes the season as the #7 if McI makes the jump.
Ad
Latest posts
-
Value of: Who stays and who goes in Vancouver this summer?- Latest: Wallet Inspector
-
-
-
