Ship him out and use the cap space wisely
Monahan for a 6-7 million dollar rental might be interesting. Monahan for MAF would be extra salty as a stupid idea, but more realistically, I wonder if the Ducks would be open to something. With the Murray hiring, I'm assuming two pieces from the Ducks might be more viable. I'm also assuming the 1C will not come and we might potentially tank retool vs scorched earth.
2022 NHL Free Agents Tracker
ie: Rakell + Getzlaff or Getzlaff + Lindholm
(Might need some minor retention)
I'd be most interested in Getzlaff + Lindholm with a side game of attempting to keep Lindholm in the group of Swedes after the run. It would be a hefty price and a huge gamble, but also a bunch of options. But IMO, I think we could make it work.
Why Ducks do this: they keep Monahan, can flip at TDL, also get additional futures they can keep. Getzlaff can return to Ducks after this season and has history in Calgary, so might be open to the idea.
Why Flames do this: A big huzzah filling shoring up weaknesses with some extra quality reserve pieces for the run. The contracts expiring at the right time for internal extensions. LD log jam coming up.
Something like...
Getzlaff/Rackell + Lindholm for Monahan + Valimaki + ??
(3)/(3.8) + (5.3) = 8.3/9.1 vs (6.3) + (1.5) = 7.9 May need minor retention to meet cap/performance bonuses.
Gaudreau - Lindholm - Toffoli (1A offense)
Mangiapane - Backlund - Tkachuk (1B defense)
Lucic - Getzlaff - Coleman (2 responsible balanced)
Dube - Ruzika - Richardson (4 wrecker surpriser)
Lewis/Ritchie/Phillips
Hanifin - Andersson
Kylington/Lindholm - Tanev
Lindholm/Kylington/Zadorov - Gubranson
Kylington/Zadorov/Mackey
Markstrom
Vladar
D. Wolf
Arse~ni
The plan might be to just rent at first, but depending on the options, maybe there's some odd future where we keep Lindholm and ship out Hanifin or even keep all 3? Also option to flip a guy if we keep a guy we didn't expect to. We also clear Monahan's 6.375 for extensions, Zadorov and Gubranson clear, but we also walk into the ploffs with a ton of muscle/skill combo even if we don't have the best speed/skill combos like some of the other teams?
I'm literally thinking of ideas that might be more along the lines of plan C options (balance of cost/long term implications) that are still relatively respectable. They're plan C because there's definitely reasons to dislike the move vs other options, but it's a pretty strong options if the plan A and B options are not available/fall through and they aren't the worst alternative quality optoins out there (ie: a 3/4th pick for someone who doesn't play).