bleedgreen
Registered User
I'd agree with that other than dalpe, who I think belongs in the top 4 still. I still think he can be a scoring winger.
Speaking of Di Giuseppe... Was he even at the development camp? I heard almost nothing about him--good or bad.
I like Rask as a prospect but I'm not really sure where this new found hype for him is coming from. McGinn produced at a similar pace to Rask despite being a year younger and coming back from a wrist injury in the offseason. I've also heard some good reviews of McGinn's game from OHL fans, whereas I don't ever really hear of Rask outside of these forums. I wouldn't say either is better than the other, and I'd have them both in the same tier as Di Giuseppe, which is another forward prospect of ours I really like. I just don't see how Rask is above these other two guys with Lindholm and Murphy who are our only elite prospects. But like I said, I expect to see everyone having a different opinion after the top two.While all info on these guys is certainly valid, I'm not going to let this week boost his stock THIS high so as to be in the same tier as Rask or Di Giuseppe. In fact, I'd even make the argument that Phil isn't in the same tier as Rask.
IMO it's Lindholm, Murphy, Rask, then everyone else. No one really stands out to me that deserves to be in the same group as those three.
I like Rask as a prospect but I'm not really sure where this new found hype for him is coming from.