Semantics
PUBLIC ENEMY #1
I wasn't really 'proposing' it, I just said that if we were going to change the lines, I'd probably try something dramatically different rather than resting my hopes on, say, bumping JVR to the second line or whatever.
Most coaches experiment with all kinds of different combinations when things aren't going well, and often even when they are. And then there's Randy. In a game like Saturday's, why *wouldn't* you just throw a bunch of random stuff at the wall and see if any of it sticks? Lupul-Santorelli-Kessel, JVR-Bozak-Clarkson, Komarov-Kadri-Panik. Just try something different for crying out loud.
We have a coach who doesn't even try to put players in a position to succeed, he just chooses a role for each of them and demands that the players succeed in spite of him. Has there ever been a more annoying coach in NHL history than this clown with his "it's your responsibility not mine" schtick? (I wonder what he thinks he was hired for if not to make the team play better.)