Drysdale is extremely comparable to Makar in his skating, puck-skills, shooting and offensive instincts/style. He's also very solid defensively. I'd be curious concerning your skepticism about him, which is to ask what exactly do you see as a possible detriment to Drysdale's success at an NHL level?
I do think he is comparable to Makar although I think Makar is better. He doesn’t really have that many holes in his game aside maybe from being physical and occasionally out of position which can be taught but many NHlers still can’t figure that out. My problem is the inconsistency in his game. I’ll admit. I have only seen him 3 times in the OHL and once he was the best player in the ice by far and twice he didn’t even show up. He gave up on the play quite often. Reminds me of Sean Day. That was one thing I noticed about him in minor midget and I saw him play probably 12-15 times. There had been too many games where he was relied on and didn’t show up and was beaten out of pure laziness and even Wong was more reliable on that team Many games. I think Wong was a seventh rounder in the O. That obviously is an issue and I’m sure is something that he needs to work on at the NHL level. If he is consistent he can be an elite defenseman but I personally just don’t see it.
On a side note. I have seen many games where McDavid gave up quite easy as a kid and OHLer.
Many games where Tavares was invisible but ended up with 5 points.
I also thought Perfetti was over rated and still think Vierling is gonna be selke contender on a regular basis.
The odds are is that I am wrong about Drysdale. But there have been many scouts wrong about other defensemen in the past while others have been right. Juolevi or even the majority of people thought Columbus was crazy for passing on Pulijarvi for Dubois.
You never know.