Emerica
Registered User
- May 29, 2010
- 10,958
- 6,269
As opposed to what we've seen all year long? We've had the worst defence in the league all year long.Could be really ugly down the stretch.
As opposed to what we've seen all year long? We've had the worst defence in the league all year long.Could be really ugly down the stretch.
Sens traded a 2020 5th round pick and Andrew Sturtz to the Habs for Mike Reilly. They just traded Reilly to Boston for a 2022 3rd round pick. Now they claim Victor Mete off waivers from the Habs.Sens hoping to replicate the Mike Reilly magic. Reilly got a 3rd this year, we'll flip Mete for a 2nd next deadline. Playin the long game.
I'm not sure if that's good news or bad news.
if he can keep the puck in the neutral zone all game im fine with it, its not in our zone so that means a very low chance we get scored on.
Just says a lot about our complement of d-men.
DJ gonna have a heart attack having to play Brann and Mete on the left side every night.
Not sure. Both Mete and Brannstrom will play for the rest of the season but the point is that it doesn't make sense to have two 5'9 d men over the long term. I don't remember the last time any NHL team had that. So this will likely make one of them expendable.Would the Senators think of moving Brannstrom to the other side now? Or, have they already made their decision already on what side he will play?
Sens traded a 2020 5th round pick and Andrew Sturtz to the Habs for Mike Reilly. They just traded Reilly to Boston for a 2022 3rd round pick. Now they claim Victor Mete off waivers from the Habs.
In the end it equates out to us giving up nothing for assets. Sturtz was a non factor, the 2020 5th is essentially replaced by grabbing Mete and then we get at 2022 3rd for flipping Reilly.
Is it possible that many fans can both see the positive things that have been done by Dorion, and criticize the bad moves?I'm sorry but this information doesn't fit the narrative of the blind Dorion haters who crap on EVERY move he makes.
I thought Mete wasn't good
Why are we excited?
As opposed to what we've seen all year long? We've had the worst defence in the league all year long.
Eh.
I don't think:
Chabot - Zaitsev
Brannstrom - Zub
Mete - Gudbranson/J.Brown
Is any worse than what we had prior to today. At all. If anything, there's more potential there.
I guess Mete and Brannstrom will compete with eachother for the rest of the season to be the sole 5'9 d man moving forwards.
It really doesn't make sense to have two 5'9 d men in the long run so it would make sense if they are competing with eachother.
Overall decent asset management move.
Samuel Girard and Cale Makar are 5'10" and 5'11" respectively. I am personally much more interested in a player's talent than his length.Not sure. Both Mete and Brannstrom will play for the rest of the season but the point is that it doesn't make sense to have two 5'9 d men over the long term. I don't remember the last time any NHL team had that. So this will likely make one of them expendable.
I thought Mete wasn't good
Why are we excited?
For sure the defense core hasn't been a strong one and the team as a whole has struggled defensively. Which is exactly why losing Reilly, who despite all his faults had become a solid contributor and relying on Brannstrom and Mete to step up and fill that hole is concerning.
Is it possible that many fans can both see the positive things that have been done by Dorion, and criticize the bad moves?
Seeing things as so monolithic or binary doesn't seem like it would be a very accurate representation of a lot of people e.g., too simplistic.