Name calling aside let’s try to have this debate without having to characterize people as just “salty” for a cheap “joke”.
This incompetent league can barely get its own on-ice rules right, let alone off ice, and they’ve already allowed legal loopholes in the past that they then had to retroactively punish and backtrack from. See Minnesota cap punishments for example. So sorry if I don’t have much trust in the competence of this League to police cap cheating. They have not earned that by reputation and recent history alone.
I mean of course for you the buck stops at whatever is advantageous to your team. Don’t even know why I’m debating with a clear bias here. It’s essentially pointless. Especially since you use such “strong” arguments as “injury history” precluding these most recent injuries as if that has any relevance. As if Neck injuries have any thing to do with leg injuries, and as if back injuries have anything to do with spleen injuries. If that’s the best mental gymnastics you have to defend this, then the debate is already over.
Let’s be honest, for as much as you say that this “strategy” is open to all teams that doesn’t mean that every team has the ability to do this. Some teams admittedly can’t risk 10M-20M off their cap. What about wild card teams fighting for their playoff lives? What about revenue strapped teams that can’t risk a star player being out of the picture? What about teams with HONORABLE players that just plain won’t risk their sportsmanship or credibility by faking an injury for cap cheating? What about teams with Stars in Contract years that won’t risk future earnings for this cap cheating scheme by sitting out for a 3rd of the year?
So essentially you’re boiling this down to just sour grapes. As if there aren’t fans of SPORT that just want to all see a fair game played.
Look elsewhere in the thread.
I already said that I’d have no grounds to complain should my team lose to another that did the same. I don’t need to prove to you or anyone else that my stance is less about bias or what you suggest is sour grapes, but you can find the post where I stated that, if you wish. My response to Tampa Bay in this was even more about enjoying popcorn while taking in the debate.
That said, once we cross into suggesting that players leave honour at home because of the sweater they put on, that’s where I crack a few jokes not intended to name-call, but to point out that any bias that raw is just the opposite number of where mine is *assumed* to be. If my bias lies anywhere, it’s *there*, where any non-neutrality I represent recalls that the Knights have been investigated, the league satisfied, and assertions of malfeasance/lack of honour presume beyond what we, on a hockey forum, can accurately determine.
Call me biased if you like, but seeing as I didn’t go drinking in Denver the day of the Cup parade getting jumped for pushing a narrative that the blue line needs to be widened to stop them from getting narrowly-offsides plays accepted as goals, I know where I stand. As soon as the league figures out where it stands on this issue and ends the practice, great. Until then, I’m looking at a roster missing 1/3 of the top-6 doing something that not only isn’t exclusive to them alone, involves players who have been under the knife repeatedly over the last 3 seasons, and loads of overlap between those complaining about this and fans of other teams with a pointed dislike for Vegas.
Should the league intervene and penalize, it becomes something different. Until then, teams tank, teams reward shitty behaviour, teams burn coaches in effigy and bury kids for not being “cadre” enough for their liking. Teams exploit things all the time - Tampa? Drafting & cap. Colorado, speed. Vegas, cash, cap and chemistry. Edmonton, phenom power.
I’m not saying that this shouldn’t change. (Besides -
please take this last part lightheartedly - I’m only as biased *for* proportionately to those biased *against.* As such, I’ll always point out where presumption can easily jump the shark if I feel the need. The last few days confirm that a number of posters have it out for the Knights - some even willing to question their honour. Like any fan supporting their team, I’ll defend “my guys,” just as earlier, pointing out that injuries late in a season ≠ deliberate cap circumvention.)
How many man-games did they lose year before last…..something like 535? It’s harder for me to believe that they’re
not going to get injured as hell with largely the same roster…..sorry for the stream of consciousness, but I’m just riffing while relaxing for the day…..but it technically cannot be a bias if I had the exact same attitude about Tampa and Dallas (I think it was?) landing over the cap come playoff time.