And Elias Pettersson is Auston Matthews. Keep em coming.You're right, Mikheyev is 500k-1m overpaid and Tavares is about 3-4m overpayed.
And Elias Pettersson is Auston Matthews. Keep em coming.You're right, Mikheyev is 500k-1m overpaid and Tavares is about 3-4m overpayed.
My post was true, this one is simply just trying to be dumb. Tavares has never been worth his 11m, and when he signed it, wasn't worth what Stamkos signed for. Should have been an 8m signing, less if he really wanted Toronto to try and win a cup. He has been over a PPG 4 times in his long career, hasn't won anything in this league. Aside from being good at face-offs, he does nothing for his team defensively.And Elias Pettersson is Auston Matthews. Keep em coming.
If you’re going to go long term in FA you do it for stars. Timing matters. Tavares, Panarin, etc. hit market once in a blue moon.My post was true, this one is simply just trying to be dumb. Tavares has never been worth his 11m, and when he signed it, wasn't worth what Stamkos signed for. Should have been an 8m signing, less if he really wanted Toronto to try and win a cup. He has been over a PPG 4 times in his long career, hasn't won anything in this league. Aside from being good at face-offs, he does nothing for his team defensively.
Elias is an elite player, and he will have a great career that could potentially be a HHoF career. Matthews is nearly a generational talent(sorry, he will never be at McDavids level) and will be a first ballot HHoF. That being said, Elias will probably sign a 6-8 year at the end of his deal, and for less than Matthews currently makes. I would wager Matthews walks away from Toronto in 2 years.
Canucks will get more out of Elias than Toronto will from Matthews by the end of their careers.
Sure. But I’d rather do neither. Which is why both teams likely never win a Cup in the near future. Too many of the top teams don’t have these boat anchor contracts. And Tavares is only going to get worse.If you’re going to go long term in FA you do it for stars. Timing matters. Tavares, Panarin, etc. hit market once in a blue moon.
I’d rather overpay a PPG star than constant middle/bottom six role players like VAN has done for 5+ years only to dump them.
Eh, the Tavares signing was a mistake. That’s what is handcuffing your team. You’d have been better off getting a 50 point two way guy.If you’re going to go long term in FA you do it for stars. Timing matters. Tavares, Panarin, etc. hit market once in a blue moon.
I’d rather overpay a PPG star than constant middle/bottom six role players like VAN has done for 5+ years only to dump them. Good luck with your fantasy "wagers".
Panarin >>>> TavaresIf you’re going to go long term in FA you do it for stars. Timing matters. Tavares, Panarin, etc. hit market once in a blue moon.
I’d rather overpay a PPG star than constant middle/bottom six role players like VAN has done for 5+ years only to dump them.
Can someone explain how he has positive expected goals and has hands of stone?
Not trying to play gotcha, I’m genuinely curious. His expected goals were WELL above league averages. About 7% above. Meaning any time he shoots the puck, his shots are going in 7% more than League averages from any given area
That doesn’t scream “hands of stone” to me. That screams “lack of opportunity”. Maybe having to play with a boat anchor like Tavares hurt him in the top 6? I dunno.
But something is fishy.
If you’re going to go long term in FA you do it for stars. Timing matters. Tavares, Panarin, etc. hit market once in a blue moon.
I’d rather overpay a PPG star than constant middle/bottom six role players like VAN has done for 5+ years only to dump them. Good luck with your fantasy "wagers".
I’m assuming it’s because he gets a lot of breakaways so his finishing on those are likely stronger. But hands of stone isn’t just related to finishing ability. His problem seems to be more that he’s not a particularly good cycle player and doesn’t use his teammates well, which doesn’t bode well for excelling with better linemates. He seems to be best utilized in a role where he and his linemates can disrupt the opposition with speed, forechecking and defensive play, and chip in offensively in the counter attack. That’s a useful player, but better suited to a good third line rather than a true top 6 role.
Jannik Hansen was kind of that way with the Canucks. He had a couple decent stints with the Sedins where he was an excellent puck retriever and could finish at a solid rate, but I don’t think he had the offensive IQ or hands to make the line better as he couldn’t work the possession game well enough, unlike Alex Burrows who was a similar but better player who could work the possession game, and brought out the best in them. Though if the Canucks don’t trade Miller, and can run strength down the middle, he might work best with Horvat, who also likes to work on the rush.
Mikheyev is way better defensively and plays the PK. But I still think as a Canucks fan he is a bit overpaidKubalik got 2 x 2.5. Is Mikheyev that much better than Kubalik?
Interesting. Looking forward to seeing Kuzmenko play. As for the Petterson debate with Mathews. All I will say is that I will never take Elias in a hockey pool ever again. Burnt me two years in a row compared to other available guys. Guy is dead to me.the extra overpayment of 500k per year is clearly a recruiting wink wink thank you fee for talking Kuzmenko into choosing Vancouver.
both parties have mentioned that a lunch in Miami between Ilya and Kuzmenko a couple of weeks before Kuzmenko made the rounds was a big factor on why Kuzmenko chose Van. Ilya said he told Kuzmenko to choose Van because of the beautiful city and the young team.
because leafs fansWhy is anyone talking about Tavares and Matthews in this thread?
Interesting. Looking forward to seeing Kuzmenko play. As for the Petterson debate with Mathews. All I will say is that I will never take Elias in a hockey pool ever again. Burnt me two years in a row compared to other available guys. Guy is dead to me.
Why is anyone talking about Tavares and Matthews in this thread?
Lot of Canucks fans just trying to chastise the Leafs for some reason.because leafs fans
A lot of guys aren't Cup winners. This is a dumb argument.Because Tavares and Matthews is similar to Canucks in many ways. They're not cup winners.
12+10 after 31 games. Add to this his 2-way game and PK, and I'd say he's worth his money.
Good stuff, it’s worked out for everyone.12+10 after 31 games. Add to this his 2-way game and PK, and I'd say he's worth his money.