I read it was by Ullmark due to geography. I would have to assume he is looking to stay on the East Coast.Is this the deal that was nixed by Ullmark or a pivot deal that ran out of time after the first deal with another team was nixed by Ullmark?
I read it was by Ullmark due to geography. I would have to assume he is looking to stay on the East Coast.
I read it was by Ullmark due to geography.
Good, I hope the Devils are in on him.
The deadline was 3pm eastern time so yes.Have Rangers said they are done ?
Eklund reported "Ullmark to Kings (e3)" a couple of hours before the deadline, so I imagine that it's the deal that fell through. Also, the stated reason of "geography" does make a little sense, since Boston and LA are almost as far away from each other as two teams can be.Is this the deal that was nixed by Ullmark or a pivot deal that ran out of time after the first deal with another team was nixed by Ullmark?
We may never know.
The deadline was 3pm eastern time so yes.
For sure. He played in Buffalo before Boston so sounds like he wants to keep his family in that general area. That is what I assume anyways.Eklund reported "Ullmark to Kings (e3)" a couple of hours before the deadline, so I imagine that it's the deal that fell through. Also, the stated reason of "geography" does make a little sense, since Boston and LA are almost as far away from each other as two teams can be.
only if you'll buy me dinner and a pony firstf*** me