s7ark
RIP
- Jul 3, 2003
- 27,579
- 174
I'm not that upset about not getting Hamonic, we need picks if McDavid and Drai eat up 17-20 million together we need as many shots at getting value contract rookies as we can
I'd be okay if Hamonic went anywhere else...
But of course the Flames get him for a ****ing song.
I don't trust the Oilers drafting and development and would rather have a sure thing, but here we're paying Kris Russell on a worse contract than Hamonic...
Doesn't Calgary need more help upfront than back on defence? At least I think so. Their forward depth is still no good.
Yeah. A lot of spin going on here.
Calgary made a great move and edmonton, not so much
Doesn't Calgary need more help upfront than back on defence? At least I think so. Their forward depth is still no good.
Because you are past tense. This have been different since his hiring. Why can't you accept that?
And their prospects pool is weak (Don't tell OKG that). Gonna get even worse with the picks traded.
I don't trust the Oilers drafting and development and would rather have a sure thing, but here we're paying Kris Russell on a worse contract than Hamonic...
Ah, **** off.
Good. let them overpay for their defense. 3-4M for their bottom pairing ensures they have no money for forward help.
And they're still clinging to Bennett turning out
Last I heard, Oilers drafted and developed Eberle and you were crying to keep him
Ah, **** off.
This makes me sick to my stomach. I can't believe this ********. This has been the worst off season we've had in a while.
How do you screw this up? Hamonic could of been an oiler had chiarelli not been an idiot.
Ah, **** off.
Stone is suspect defensively. No interest in him. It's nice to see Treliving rely on the same one line to run the offense though. Stellar defense, one line offense and a whiny Mike Smith in net. Looking forward to that series again next year.