If that's true, he'll still need the right linemates, and he needs to be a contributor that's worth accommodating.Not so sure, I feel like he's starting to understand how to play at his new (slow) speed at this point.
If that's true, he'll still need the right linemates, and he needs to be a contributor that's worth accommodating.Not so sure, I feel like he's starting to understand how to play at his new (slow) speed at this point.
And after he crashed out on 3 different teams The Habs would want him why exactly?If LA crashes out against EDM again, and PLD doesn't produce, their management will be under serious pressure to unload him. I can see a scenario where habs trade Anderson and Gallagher for PLD straight up.
A 4ish year deal that isnt too high in cap hit it wouldn't be a problem. They have plenty of guys coming off the books and the cap is going up so much.Not for a long term deal that will likely be another anchor in a couple of years.
Id rather PLD (1 player) than 2 players taking up spots. His cap hit is not that bad if he just plays to his 60pts/season. Hes the right age for our core, right size we are lacking, and can play C if Dach gets injured again.And after he crashed out on 3 different teams The Habs would want him why exactly?
No really, you want size on backend. Especially with Hutson hereI would maybe sign Alexandre Carrier to prepare for the inevitable departure of Savard. I think he’d be a good fit with Guhle, and help fill the void of veteran leadership that will go with Savard.
Well first of all PLDs contract is 4 years longer not 2. This is not worth the risk. He flaked on 2 teams already and now seems disinterested in the third. PLD just don't make sense. The Habs don't need lazy players.Id rather PLD (1 player) than 2 players taking up spots. His cap hit is not that bad if he just plays to his 60pts/season. Hes the right age for our core, right size we are lacking, and can play C if Dach gets injured again.
Sure his contract runs 2 years longer, but he is not aging out (still under 30).
I'd do it.. LA can't stand him, so theyll be happy with lowiq Andy and sparkplug Gally on their 3rd line.. Danault might be happy too..
4 years longer, meh id still take him vs andy/gally, at least he adds skill.Well first of all PLDs contract is 4 years longer not 2. This is not worth the risk. He flaked on 2 teams already and now seems disinterested in the third. PLD just don't make sense. The Habs don't need lazy players.
Also LA isnt adding cap space for this kind of deal.
what family? His father is in Manitoba isn't he?4 years longer, meh id still take him vs andy/gally, at least he adds skill.
And LA would gladly take on the extra money than to be joined with PLD for 7 more years.
I think in MTL, PLD would do well (vs if we gave up what LA did last year). His contract would not be an eyesore, as it represents a legit improvement to the lineup. And he would be with family, CLB and WPG are two of the worst places to play, who knows how much this screwed him up?? Look at Laine, same thing.
what family? His father is in Manitoba isn't he?
I strongly disagree. ''I think The Habs would end up paying 8.5 for 7 more years to a 3rd line guy.4 years longer, meh id still take him vs andy/gally, at least he adds skill.
And LA would gladly take on the extra money than to be joined with PLD for 7 more years.
I think in MTL, PLD would do well (vs if we gave up what LA did last year). His contract would not be an eyesore, as it represents a legit improvement to the lineup. And he would be with family, CLB and WPG are two of the worst places to play, who knows how much this screwed him up?? Look at Laine, same thing.
Like I said if it was no longer than 4 years and a reasonable cap hit then I think it makes sense. I mean even if he regresses down to 25ish goals its still worth it. He is 33 and just put up his best season so far.Not for a long term deal that will likely be another anchor in a couple of years.
At 33 can't see Marchessault getting more than 4 at most. Similar to Giroux deal. If he sign for 3 year, I would offer 7.8m per. If he wants longer I would look elsewhere or trade route.Like I said if it was no longer than 4 years and a reasonable cap hit then I think it makes sense. I mean even if he regresses down to 25ish goals its still worth it. He is 33 and just put up his best season so far.
yea 3 or 4 is what I would do but 7.8 is probably more than I would be comfortable with. He makes 5 right now so a raise for sure. So maybe 4 years at 6 or 6.5At 33 can't see Marchessault getting more than 4 at most. Similar to Giroux deal. If he sign for 3 year, I would offer 7.8m per. If he wants longer I would look elsewhere or trade route.
And family spend off seasons in Georgia where his mothers fromwhat family? His father is in Manitoba isn't he?
I very much doubt LA accepts.If LA crashes out against EDM again, and PLD doesn't produce, their management will be under serious pressure to unload him. I can see a scenario where habs trade Anderson and Gallagher for PLD straight up.
Is a 32 year old 16 goal scorer with heart worth $3.25M for 3 years?There may be GM's that still value Anderson but it would take 2 1st's to unload Gallagher.
Exactly.BPA no matter what.
This isn't the Bergy era, HuGo aren't afraid to make big deals to get forwards....
Take the bpa and use the young D you have to make a deal along with the Peg 1st. I would bet they make a big deal for a forward at or near the draft.
Yes we get rid of two contracts but then we have a distraction for another 7 years. It doesn't make sense in terms of what we're trying to build here. We want hard workers who are good teammates. Dubois is neither unfortunately.If LA crashes out against EDM again, and PLD doesn't produce, their management will be under serious pressure to unload him. I can see a scenario where habs trade Anderson and Gallagher for PLD straight up.
1) NoOut of the box options coming, you have to give to get:
Guhle for Necas
Montreal 1st for Zegras
Winnipeg 1st plus Savard for Holtz
Armia for a 3rd round pick
Sign Matt Roy to replace Savard (4.5 years younger)
Sign Sean Monahan as UFA to mentor the forwards and allow Beck or Mesar time to develop.
One of Mailloux or Hutson makes the team.
We get younger, more offensive talent, and finish up with about $5M of cap space.
Following year, we have the $5M plus $4.4M Dvorak plus $4.2M retention plus $2M cap increase, total $15.6M to give raises to Slaf, Struble and Primeau and add one more good player.
Chatfield is a #6 on Carolina, playing 15-17 mins/game with no PP or PK time.I can’t say I’ve seen a lot of Chatfield, but he’s at 15:12 ATOI for the year and has been a healthy scratch at times. Carolina has a very solid defence corps, but I’d be concerned as to whether he’s just a guy that looks good in limited minutes. What kind of contract are you thinking and is it worth adding to the logjam?
Out of the box options coming, you have to give to get:
Guhle for Necas
Montreal 1st for Zegras
Winnipeg 1st plus Savard for Holtz
Armia for a 3rd round pick
Sign Matt Roy to replace Savard (4.5 years younger)
Sign Sean Monahan as UFA to mentor the forwards and allow Beck or Mesar time to develop.
One of Mailloux or Hutson makes the team.
We get younger, more offensive talent, and finish up with about $5M of cap space.
Following year, we have the $5M plus $4.4M Dvorak plus $4.2M retention plus $2M cap increase, total $15.6M to give raises to Slaf, Struble and Primeau and add one more good player.
Oh god this again.If LA crashes out against EDM again, and PLD doesn't produce, their management will be under serious pressure to unload him. I can see a scenario where habs trade Anderson and Gallagher for PLD straight up.
No to trading Guhle. No to trading Habs 1st this year for Zegras. The rest are maybes to me.
If LA crashes out against EDM again, and PLD doesn't produce, their management will be under serious pressure to unload him. I can see a scenario where habs trade Anderson and Gallagher for PLD straight up.
Is la a bad place to play? You have tons of cash in la you live very well. He still could not get it done.4 years longer, meh id still take him vs andy/gally, at least he adds skill.
And LA would gladly take on the extra money than to be joined with PLD for 7 more years.
I think in MTL, PLD would do well (vs if we gave up what LA did last year). His contract would not be an eyesore, as it represents a legit improvement to the lineup. And he would be with family, CLB and WPG are two of the worst places to play, who knows how much this screwed him up?? Look at Laine, same thing.