tbcwpg
Moderator
- Jan 25, 2011
- 16,211
- 19,096
If the Jets pick up a defenceman, I want them to go big and pick up someone like John Klingberg. I feel like Chevy has a big, unexpected pickup in him, just like when he first acquired Statsny.
Hard to say with Dallas- really difficult to evaluate them having played so few games compared to others in the Central. 6-8-4 start isn’t exactly noteworthy.Dallas still has Klingberg under contract for another year after this one. Can't see them letting him go yet. More likely they try and move Oleksiak if they are out of a playoff spot.
Hard to say with Dallas- really difficult to evaluate them having played so few games compared to others in the Central. 6-8-4 start isn’t exactly noteworthy.
They would probably do well to sell a guy like Klingberg, pick up a 1st and top prospect, get a high pick of their own this year, and retool for next year.
Edit: Just to add, current Don Luszczyszyn models show Dallas finishing 5th in the Central behind TBL, CAR, FLA, CHI.
Wiebe lighting a fire under the Ekholm trade talk...
He's not saying anything that 30 posters haven't said on here lately. Ekholm could be a trade target....also, water is wet.Wiebe lighting a fire under the Ekholm trade talk...
What if its John Klingberg...I'm having a hard time seeing us giving up the assets needed to land an impact D-man.
We can't really afford to part with a 1st for an expiring contract and anyone with term only complicates the expansion draft strategy.
What if its John Klingberg...
weibe lost me at “ pre emptive strike “ Chevy has never done that and won’t this time. He will wait as long as he can before adding.
Ekholms strength is clearing the front of the net. This should make him a target because we don’t have one defensman clearing the front of our net effectively
What if its John Klingberg...
Isn’t that the same price as Dumba?Be prepared to pay through the nose for 2 years of Klingberg then. 1st, likely one of Heinola/Samberg, possibly more.
Isn’t that the same price as Dumba?
I'm having a hard time seeing us giving up the assets needed to land an impact D-man.
We can't really afford to part with a 1st for an expiring contract and anyone with term only complicates the expansion draft strategy.
DeMelo and Perfetti...?Be prepared to pay through the nose for 2 years of Klingberg then. 1st, likely one of Heinola/Samberg, possibly more.
If we bring in David Savard to be our 1RHD, we are finished.That’s why Savard might make more sense. First off, he is a RHD. Secondly I see Ekholm as being coveted by more teams which will drive up the cost. And lastly, the cost on Savard may not be as steep due to him being a UFA and maybe not performing up to his own standards on a floundering Columbus team.
I'm curious how we show a more complete game...?Obviously there's exceptions but what would he cost to acquire and then who do we possibly lose by having to protect him? I think the Jets would need to show a more complete game to really justify any kind of an "all-in" type move.
We're having a really good season but the lack of variety in opponents could be further shielding our weak spots beyond what we can see.
Jets probably need two upgrades on D to really be considered a serious threat for the Cup and if one of those doesn't come from within house then the cost to acquire those pieces is likely more then we can pay (short and long term).
I'm curious how we show a more complete game...?
We only have bad games when Beaulieu is in our top D pairing... we look 'good' when Poolman is up there and he's really not a great Dman...
JoMo-Klingberg
Forbort-Pionk
Beaulieu/Stanley-Poolman
That is a Stanley Cup D core paired with our top 9