RLF
Registered User
- May 5, 2014
- 3,303
- 890
Oh, I don't know about that. Playing with Marner and Tavares, he might not need to be first in on the puck as they'd mostly be carrying the puck in the O-zone with possession and then start cycling which Leivo's really good at. The best thing to do IMO would have been to give it a try, then we'd know for sure.
It's not that big a deal, we have lots of forwards so losing Leivo isn't a crushing blow or anything but still, I can't help but think where we'd be at if we'd have done what many of us wanted - trade JVR before last season started and give Leivo a chance to play in his place. Had we done that, we would have pocketed a 1st round pick + whatever else for JVR and then if Leivo did have success in that role, we could have flipped him yesterday for maybe a 2nd+4th or whatever depending on just how well he did and it sure would be nice to have those picks in the cupboard. Or keep him and settle for the 1st rounder plus having Leivo in our top 6 until we can no longer afford him
They dump the puck in way more than carry it in. That is our style of play. No, it would not have hurt to try, but man, it would be hard to get any line chemistry with all the changes everyone wants to "try". Move this guy here and then that guy there. I am not without my own, "I would like to try this or that" as well, but also recognize the success we have had. Three seasons ago last place, then two seasons of playoffs with improvement every year. Most teams who have success the year after being horrible, regress the next year. We haven't, which is great.
We could have moved JVR and tried it for sure. Does it mean it would have been better, I don't know. Were we guaranteed a 1st+ for JVR? Again, I don't know. As I said, I think Leivo is a good player, just wasn't better at what he does than the other guys who play that role on the top 3 lines...so he was moved. The team is no worse off right now, so...