Hmm perhaps you are right but I highly doubt Therrien benches Boullion. I see it as: Markov, Kaberle, Subban, Gorges, Boullion, Emelin/Diaz (alternating based on play).Maybe so. And everyone is obviously entitled to their opinion. Yet, if there's a smurf who doesn't play his size, it's him. AND we are talking about a guy, who will most likely not be a gimme top 6 every single night. While Kaberle definately is.
Hmm perhaps you are right but I highly doubt Therrien benches Boullion. I see it as: Markov, Kaberle, Subban, Gorges, Boullion, Emelin/Diaz (alternating based on play).
Personally I dislike Weber, he's had so many chances to prove himself but he's just too weak and too many turnovers.
Thats the point tho still. His only redeeming quality is his supposed PP prowess yet did nothing to improve it. Every team can at least come up with a good five man PP unit. Its about execution. It was bad prior to Kaberle and bad after. In terms of the point of the trade, it was a colossal failure.
We are at the Ben Maxwell type of trade time for Weber. Good luck elsewhere. You deserve a shot. But not with us. But his lack of progression is not solely on him. We tried the best we could to play in his head with all this forward/defense movement with him. And on D, he ends up playing limited minutes. And then we wonder why he fails when he plays more......Like every person, he needed confidence and playing time at his position. Not saying that if we trade him, he's going to be an all-star. Not a fan as well. But he might do better than we think he'll be doing. But it's not the point anymore. We need to find somebody else we can use to get his career going as well.
Less to do with his height than his actual ability. The habs were lacking a guy who could clear the crease. Bouillon can't really do that. He's just a plug we signed. Don't hate it, but I don't expect him to bring any dimension we were lacking in.
We are at the Ben Maxwell type of trade time for Weber. Good luck elsewhere. You deserve a shot. But not with us. But his lack of progression is not solely on him. We tried the best we could to play in his head with all this forward/defense movement with him. And on D, he ends up playing limited minutes. And then we wonder why he fails when he plays more......Like every person, he needed confidence and playing time at his position. Not saying that if we trade him, he's going to be an all-star. Not a fan as well. But he might do better than we think he'll be doing. But it's not the point anymore. We need to find somebody else we can use to get his career going as well.
Pretty much how I feel (except I'm kind of a "fan", well... at least I'm pulling for him to succeed). I doubt he has a spot on this team anymore, which I think is sad because he really wasn't used properly. He needs a change of scenery that's for sure. There has to be a team out there for that could use him.
Not that I disagree, but aren't you one of the first to criticize management for giving away young players who go on to be successful elsewhere? Isn't that what this will likely be? His value is bordering on nothing at this point. I would like to squeeze him into the lineup at some point in hopes he'll contribute on the 2nd pp and up his value some.
I would of preferred to suffer the woes of weber than to sign kaberle, who has as many shortcomings in the d-zone. Kabs is superior offensively to this point, but we've kind of positioned ourselves to never know what we've got in weber. Weber is still young, I'd much rather evaluate him on my borderline playoff team then give his minutes to a similar one dimensional player who's career is likely nearly done.
Thoughts?
This idea that he did nothing to improve the PP is complete and utter crap. I dug up the numbers months ago during another Kaberle bash fest. He played roughly half of Montreal games. In those games the PP was somewhere near 17.5%. In games without Kaberle the PP was 11.6%.
If someone can explain how that is NOT an improvement I would love to hear it. It's not just a minor improvement, it's a gigantic improvement. In fact the PP was 50% more effective with Kaberle than without him.
What is more impressive about those numbers is that, generally speaking, the pre-Kaberle PP featured snipers Cammalleri and Gionta. But the Kaberle PP mostly had neither, as those two guys were replaced by Bourque and nothing. And Kaberle had to deal with Cunneyworth running the show too.
So if anyone wants to bash Kaberle, go ahead, but spare me the insanely wrong notion that he didn't improve the power play. He did. Immensely.
There's nothing wrong with Tomas Kaberle's contract. $4.25 mil a year is solid. He's put up solid numbers. Kab isn't a tough in your face player. He's a puck moving defenseman. I don't think MT should put him against top players. On the powerplay we need him on the second unit. It makes a huge difference because we have two solid powerplay units (pacorioetty, cole, desharnais) (gionta, plekanec, ?).
Defensemen I would pair up:
1. Subban-Gorges
2. Markov-Emelin
3. Kaberle-Boullion/Diaz/Weber
Personally I dislike Weber, he's had so many chances to prove himself but he's just too weak and too many turnovers.
If Emelin is alternating, I'd be even more pissed than when Martin coached this team. Emelin is not on alternate mode anymore. For me it's Bouillon/Diaz/or a surprise rookie for #6/#7.
The thing is both Bouillon and Kaberle can't really play on the right side and Kaberle-Diaz/Weber pairing is way too soft. That's why I don't like having Kaberle on he team. I think I'd rather go with a Bouillon-Diaz pairing.
Why would people hate Bouillon when the guy is not even sure to be top 6? Can we say the same for Kaberle?
Cube was top four in even strength minutes on one of the best defensive teams in the league last year. He'll play in the top six, just not on any special teams.
Bergevin will undoubtedly enjoy what Gauthier has set him up with. 7 picks in the first two rounds of two deep drafts and a solid core of players to build around not to mention our first true powerforward in probably 20 years.
Gauthier made some tough choices that the likes of you and the rest would have villified him for no matter the direction he chose, I think that is pretty apparent.
You go on and on ad nauseum about Kaberle who is the smallest part of the problem, we get it. Apparently Kaberle caused us to lose our first 7 games and pretty much wrote the season off. You are always good for a laugh.
Remember when you were saying "Gauthier will never work in the NHL again!" That is gone eh? Apparently when our PP was awful and Martin was playing gomez instead of Cole all we needed was some "toughness" we just needed to win some fights and like magic our team would know how to get out of it's zone.
Cube was top four in even strength minutes on one of the best defensive teams in the league last year. He'll play in the top six, just not on any special teams.
Kabs makes sense for this team as we will need as much offence from the backend as possible. In Kabs, PK, and Markov we could likely have 3 D with 40+ points this year....