I don't think it is a question of Patty wanting to re-sign. I don't know if he would or won't. All I know is that I would not pay Patty 5.5M at all. I honestly would not pay him more than 3.5-4M AAV and feel that even that is pushing it. His numbers have dropped 2 years in row and unless he shows a big bounce-back next year, he would be hard-pressed to demand (or get) 5.5M.
I know you still see him as a top-6 player but I do not. Which is why I find it easier to move him. Next year without Patty I see our line-up being:
XX/Hertl-Jumbo-Pavs
Goldobin-Couture-Donskoi
Ward-Hertl/XX-Karlsson
Zubrus/Nieto-Tierney-Wingels
Best case, XX is Meier who with some luck just clicks with the Joes. If not, they look for a top-6 player in FA. If Donskoi continues improving the way he has and Patty stays at the same level (or regresses), Patty will be the worst player in our top-6 if we ice:
Hertl-Jumbo-Pavs
Patty-Couture-Donskoi
You will probably disagree with me, but that is how I feel about Patty.
What exactly is there that shows that Marleau isn't a top six player? His time is obviously there. His production is still there. His effectiveness is still there for that standard. He's not producing at the levels of Marleau from yesteryear but he's still top six easily especially given the factors that have gone into his usage and who he is playing with. If Marleau is playing with Couture and Donskoi the entire year, even this year, his even strength production increases dramatically. And I wouldn't even be mad if they relegated him to the 3rd line if they use that 3rd line like they did with Couture and Donskoi this year. I think a line like Goldobin-Marleau-Ward can work significantly better in a more sheltered role just like other lines can.