He's Happy Gilmore with marginally better skating skills.
You're kidding, yes? You missed a in your message?
I'll just leave this here.
You're right, I was kidding. His slapshot isn't as good.
Dangerous d-man > mediocre forward
you are wrong on both counts.
byfuglien has never said that. It was the Thrashers GM who made that move and it was reported million of times that other teams GM's were happy because he would be less of a threat.
it was also known that Dudley was asked why would you want to make that move when Buff could get 50 pts as a forward. his response was something because it would be great to have a defensmen that can score 50 pts.
All in all Buff would not even be in the NHL if it wasn't his run in the playoffs with the blackhawks. He was destined to be an AHL defensmen until Bowman made the decision with the coaches to put him on the 3rd line.
I think this is right. My recollection is that Buff agreed to try defense for Waddell.
Is this even a point of contention?
Buff started at D, moved to forward during his time with the 'Hawks, then moved back to D with the Thrashers.
Buff has no interest in playing forward, he said that last year.
Dustin Byfuglien is clearly the most valuable and best hockey player the Winnipeg Jets have. But he is not the best defensmen......
Byfuglien is the best Jets player for puck control at centre ice / as well is the best at moving it into the attack zone. He sets plays up and makes plays for his teammates.
If he wants to play a hybrid role. Put him at FORWARD and let him play DEFENSMEN for fun.
He could be a superstar player not just in the eyes of Jets fans but the entire hockey world. A complete waste of talent and value having him play in the back end.
It's weird that I remember the same thing as fats even though you have the opposite recollection. It almost feels like I was there when it happened...
Funny thread though!
He's Happy Gilmore with marginally better skating skills.
You're kidding, yes? You missed a in your message?
I'll just leave this here.