I used McGinn as an example because he had a few years left on his deal when we acquired him. What is so difficult to understand about that? You actually think some team is going to give up a 2nd or 3rd for Bjugs without asking us to either take back salary or a contract like McGinns? His contract the next 3 years is no bargain. A caveat would be to keep Nick next season and if he puts up 40-45 pts on mostly the 3rd line then it's possible to get even parity in a trade. If Nick hadn't been showcased on the first line, IMO he would have been a buyout candidate even projecting 100% 3rd line minutes and 30-37 pts.
Your infatuation with Huberdeau borders on obsession. The guy is a very good LW who can play for any team that doesn't place a premium on winger speed. In case you haven't noticed, there aren't too many top 6 wingers on the remaining teams that aren't a hell of a lot faster than Huby. It's part of the DNA in today's game. Granted Huby has improved his overall skating, but he still relies on his slick stick work/passing to move the puck and his IQ/strength to get to the high scoring areas.
You think he's on a great contract, huh? In other words he should be getting $7 to $8M.
The guy played 36 games with Tro and had 23 pts which equals .6388 per game.............or projected to 82 games = 52 pts. He also averages around 3:25 minutes a game on the 1st PP Unit and 19 pts, which was second to Tro's 3:48 minutes a game and 27 pts. Nick had 49 pts and only averages 1:51 minutes on the 2nd PP Unit and 7 pts. Makes you wonder what kind of pts Nick could put up if he averaged 3:25 minutes per game on the 1st PP Unit. I'll give him the fact that the 2nd line didn't have a RW that could consistently have chemistry with Tro. Find the missing link........and yes......Huby could produce numbers close to what he did on the 1st line.