Tanenbaum criticized at BOG meeting

Discussion in 'The Business of Hockey' started by Regency, Mar 4, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Regency

    Regency Registered User

    Joined:
    May 17, 2004
    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Toronto
  2. Munchausen

    Munchausen Guest

    Interesting, if true, but very vague. I would like to get further details on this.

    I don't know Steve Simmons, is he a credible journalist or a mouthpiece with an agenda?
     
  3. arnie

    arnie Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Messages:
    520
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Leafs have continually thumbed their nose at the NHL and tried to undermine their baragining position. They went out and comitted over $40 million on payroll for this year (with stil other players to sign) when the league was saying that they wanted a $33 million salary cap.

    The Leafs are the one team that is losing big time from the lockout. With a new CBA containing a low salary cap, they won't be able to go out and cover their mismanagement by simply buying players as they have done over the last 5 years. Its is hardly surprising that they are whining the loudest.
     
  4. SENSible1*

    SENSible1* Guest

    The Leafs are quickly discovering that they have exactly the same vote as Nashville.

    Looks good on them for their stupidity leading into the lockout.
     
  5. ACC1224

    ACC1224 Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    45,274
    Likes Received:
    1,869
    Trophy Points:
    231
    What stupidity?
     
  6. chiavsfan

    chiavsfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    4,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Radio News Director
    Location:
    Chicagoland, IL
    Home Page:
    I think their only stupidity is on the GM side, who bring in overpaid players on their last legs, hoping to get one last wind out of them before they collapse

    I guess that does count as stupidity though
     
  7. SENSible1*

    SENSible1* Guest

  8. dakota

    dakota Registered User

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Ottawa
    Home Page:
    I think he is referring to their contract status... they are one of the few teams that had a lot of money committed to players... after being told about the potential for a lockout for years... when the NHL comes back the Leafs may be one of the teams that has to "shed" salaries.
     
  9. ScottyBowman

    ScottyBowman Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003
    Messages:
    2,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Detroit
    Home Page:
    God forbid they try to compete and win a cup rather than whine like the oilers and flames. Sounds like you have Leaf envy.
     
  10. ACC1224

    ACC1224 Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    45,274
    Likes Received:
    1,869
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Right, but how has that affected them to this date? Maybe I missed something but which of these players they signed are they paying today?
     
  11. triggrman

    triggrman Registered User

    Joined:
    May 8, 2002
    Messages:
    24,533
    Likes Received:
    619
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Murfreesboro, TN
    Home Page:
    So who had the better cup run again?
     
  12. SENSible1*

    SENSible1* Guest


    I don't envy stupidity.

    They engaged in activity that was the polar opposite of the direction the league was heading.

    They further this stupidity by undermining the league during the lockout.

    They can't feign surprize when they get slapped back to reality.
     
  13. SENSible1*

    SENSible1* Guest

    They have tried to undermine the leagues stance so they won't have to face the consequences of their stupidity when a cap is put in place.

    They paid Belfour for most of the season.
     
  14. Brewleaguer

    Brewleaguer Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  15. Jarqui

    Jarqui Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    1,886
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Home Page:
    You have to take Simmons with a Mack truck load of salt. He's been 180 degrees wrong many, many times going for the sensational, tabloid stuff.

    I suspect that there is some merit to the story in that differences of opinion were expressed and the Leafs were one of the bigger financial losers with the cancellation. But I really doubt that it was as big a deal as Simmons makes it out to be.

    The Leafs make out like bandits financially with a cap and limited revenue sharing and a more stable business which would see their valuation sky rocket. The Teachers Pension (majority owner) would love that too.
     
  16. SENSible1*

    SENSible1* Guest

    I'm sure Ed "the strangler" Snider might have a few choice words for anyone he sees as helping Goodenow.
     
  17. Brent Burns Beard

    Brent Burns Beard DontTouchMyDonskoi!

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    5,136
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    146
    so whats the problem then ? clearly CGY isnt disadvantaged vs TOR.

    sheesh .... which is it ?

    dr
     
  18. me2

    me2 Calling out the crap

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Messages:
    33,076
    Likes Received:
    1,137
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Location:
    Blasting the bull***
    Taking a guess

    Hawks and Bruins would be the obvious vocal choices.
    Detroit has been backing the smaller franchises.

    According to Burke there were two big market clubs vs rest. Looks like Bettman's "8 man gang" is closer to a "28 man gang". So who is siding with TO? Habs (owner needs money)? Rags? Stars? Flyers? Avs? Van?

    Flyers, Habs or Rags would be my picks.
     
  19. Steve L*

    Steve L* Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    11,548
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Southampton, England
    Home Page:
    Its not the flyers for sure, theyve been preparing for the cap for a while, why else let your $5m top goalscorer leave after last season?

    The Flyers are 100% behind a cap.
     
  20. AH

    AH Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    4,881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Woodbridge, ON
    As much as I would like to believe this story, I have a real hard time believing anything Steve Simmons has to say.
     
  21. RangerBoy

    RangerBoy TRUST THE PROCESS

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2002
    Messages:
    38,537
    Likes Received:
    2,077
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    New York
    Home Page:
    The Flyers have been preparing for the cap?
     
  22. Munchausen

    Munchausen Guest

    You can eliminate 2 of those. The Habs are not a big market. They have a huge fanbase but some of the highest building and land taxes in the NHL. President Pierre Boivin came out publicly after the season was canceled saying the 42.5M figure was a stretch for them and he certainly wasn't happy about it. They were hoping the number would top at about 40M. The Habs will have lost 20M in operation costs this year because of this lockout, so they are one of the teams who lose less by playing, but they still lose money under the previous CBA regardless.

    Also, considering Ed Snyder's passionate rants against Goodenow and the PA, it certainly doesn't look like the Flyers are siding with TO either.

    The only 2 big markets out there that I think might be completely opposed to Bettman's demands are Toronto and NYR. I could see Detroit, NJ, Colorado, Dallas and Philly on the fence (meaning either way, we don't care) and the rest firmly behind Bettman (some with a harder position than others of course).
     
  23. AlexGodynyuk

    AlexGodynyuk Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Well, ummm, which team has turned a profit running their business for the last few years?
    They played by the rules set-forth in the old CBA and managed to be profitable.
    You ask me, the stupid teams were the ones spending money that they didn't have and losing money every year (or banking on a playoff run to the finals in order to be profitable).
     
  24. ACC1224

    ACC1224 Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    45,274
    Likes Received:
    1,869
    Trophy Points:
    231
    but they had no right to expect hockey to be played this year.
     
  25. nyrmessier011

    nyrmessier011 Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2005
    Messages:
    3,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Charlotte/NYC
    Like I have been saying all along: This lockout is for a select few. As it drags on we will discover that its really for about 10 owners, and it's sad that out of those 10 "organizations", 6 or 7 shouldn't be hockey teams in the first place. But they are thanks to all of you pro-owners' golden boy: Gary Bettman. Unanimous my ASS
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"