Prospect Info: STI 2021 Draft Rankings 2.0 for May -- Top 64

Its Always Sundstrom

Among the optimists.
Sponsor
Dec 1, 2019
4,652
9,628
Land of Hope & Cups.
I’d love to hear more about Scott Morrow. 6’2 RD with massive upside, especially offensively. Sounds like the main knock on him is the level of competition he played against. People/scouts said the same thing about Jr. A defensemen like Makar and Fabbro though.

Leaving the first round with Hughes + Morrow sounds extremely appealing. Highly doubt Morrow lasts until our 2nd round pick. What are your takes on Morrow in the 1st?

Just in case you haven’t seen this, @StevenToddIves write up on Morrow:

2021 Draft Profile:

RD Scott Morrow, Shattuck St.Mary's USHS

There are a lot of players who are tough to evaluate for the 2021 simply because they are playing in different leagues than their ability and development would ordinarily dictate due to the pandemic. Earlier today, I wrote up winger Fabian Lysell, who is playing in the Swedish men's league to his detriment, since he is not physically developed yet. Darien, CT native Scott Morrow has the opposite problem -- he's a highly athletic specimen in a man's body (6'2-195) who is playing against high school kids who are not even in his stratosphere, talent wise. This makes a defenseman -- especially an offensive-minded one -- difficult to assess. Many of the mistakes he makes on gambles he does not pay for, simply because the competition cannot get the puck away from him, or they've backed away from him too far to take advantage, or because Morrow can catch most opposing forwards from behind with two strong strides.

However, in an uncertain draft year, we need to concentrate on the fact that, after Brandt Clarke, Scott Morrow is one of the two front runners (along with Corson Ceulemans) as the most gifted RD in the class. He's a phenomenal 4-way skater with excellent offensive instincts and a silky set of hands. Taking into account the competition, I've seen highlight-reel plays of Morrow weaving through the entire opposing team to score a ridiculous goal. He's also possessing terrific passing vision and the foresight to make quick shifts in the offensive zone to open up passing lanes, which he is all aces at hitting with authority and acuity. His breakout passing game is absolutely terrific, and (again) against sub-par competition he is always looking for the stretch pass when he has time in his own zone. There is a metric ton of projection for a high school defenseman to be certain, but in this particular scenario in this particular draft year we must focus on the fact that all the tools and mental abilities exist in this kid to be a very serious asset to an NHL blueline. If there's a flaw in Morrow's offensive arsenal, it's that he really needs to improve the accuracy of his shot. I like the potential here -- as Morrow is an athletic kid with strength and power and a good release -- but at times it seems he's just unloading with no idea where the thing will wind up.

As terrific as Morrow is offensively, he's very difficult to get a grip on defensively. When he is engaged, he shows great gaps and is very difficult to beat one-on-one. But the consistency of effort is not always there. Maybe it's because his competition is beneath him? Morrow can start the first period as a good defender, and then develop a score of bad habits by the third. It's almost as if he gets bored if he has not done anything spectacular in a few shifts, and then will take unnecessary risks which lead to scoring opportunities for the opposition. This is connected to his other problem, where sometimes he can beat two men and seem surprised by the appearance of a third defender, leading to coughing up the puck with solid regularity.

Make no mistake, Scott Morrow is a legitimate NHL talent for the mid-to-late first round. You're going to need to be patient and development and coaching will be crucial in his development, but he's going to an outstanding North Dakota program next year. We're talking about a kid who certainly has mid-pairing upside and maybe even more. RDs this size with this type of superlative skating and such silky hands do not come around very often. I'm mentioning him early on in my draft profiles because -- as we all know -- the Devils are organizationally desperate at the position of RD. Brandt Clarke is the runaway top option at the position -- a surefire top 7 pick. But the only other serious contenders to be taken in the first round (albeit in the bottom half) are Morrow and Ceulemans. I'm uncertain as of yet who I'm ranking higher out of the two -- they are both high upside potential NHLers with significant risk attached. But if the Devils find themselves acquiring a second pick in the first round after the trade deadline (Mr. Fitzgerald, we're looking at you), Scott Morrow is certainly a name which should be attracting a great deal of attention from New Jersey fans.
 

AusDev

Registered User
Jan 13, 2015
292
122
I’d love to hear more about Scott Morrow. 6’2 RD with massive upside, especially offensively. Sounds like the main knock on him is the level of competition he played against. People/scouts said the same thing about Jr. A defensemen like Makar and Fabbro though.

Leaving the first round with Hughes + Morrow sounds extremely appealing. Highly doubt Morrow lasts until our 2nd round pick. What are your takes on Morrow in the 1st?

Edit: To add, his head coach at Shattuck stated that Morrow’s got more talent than Cam York and Jackson Lacombe.

The couple of draft guides that I've gone through so far basically mention his defensive decision making and overall compete as question marks.

They have nothing but praise for his skating and offensive game though. One projected him as a top-4 powerplay specialist, so I guess the question is whether or not he will be able to hold his own defensively as he progresses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
The couple of draft guides that I've gone through so far basically mention his defensive decision making and overall compete as question marks.

They have nothing but praise for his skating and offensive game though. One projected him as a top-4 powerplay specialist, so I guess the question is whether or not he will be able to hold his own defensively as he progresses.

If he's not that engaged and competitive it's hard to see NJ going for him. Maybe with a guy like that it comes down to the interview process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AusDev

AusDev

Registered User
Jan 13, 2015
292
122
If he's not that engaged and competitive it's hard to see NJ going for him. Maybe with a guy like that it comes down to the interview process.

Yeah, quite possibly. I mean in a year like this it might even come down to the particular game a scout watched, who knows.

I should say, his defensive decision making came across as the biggest concern, the comments about his compete level were relatively brief.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
10,385
24,633
Brooklyn, NY
I’d love to hear more about Scott Morrow. 6’2 RD with massive upside, especially offensively. Sounds like the main knock on him is the level of competition he played against. People/scouts said the same thing about Jr. A defensemen like Makar and Fabbro though.

Leaving the first round with Hughes + Morrow sounds extremely appealing. Highly doubt Morrow lasts until our 2nd round pick. What are your takes on Morrow in the 1st?

Edit: To add, his head coach at Shattuck stated that Morrow’s got more talent than Cam York and Jackson Lacombe.

Morrow is certainly a huge talent, but the only knock on him is not simply competition -- as was the case with Makar and Fabbro. Morrow tends to play a complacent game in knowing how much better he is than the competition, as opposed to Fabbro who always was extremely responsible defensively or Makar who was always trying to outdo his own achievements. Though this is not an indictment of Morrow, it does raise the question of whether he is simply bored playing beneath his level, or whether there are problems with his 200-foot commitment or compete level.

If Morrow answers these questions, he certainly has the potential to be a terrific NHL defenseman, certainly a 3/4 who can head a 2PP at the NHL level. But again, we have to ask the question: why did he not dominate in all aspects of the game playing against kids who did not belong on the same ice as a potential NHL first round pick? Defensively, he was so-so at best, even at a very modest high school level, and as one of the older players in the league.

I agree that Morrow's skill set outshines York and LaCombe. To be honest, I have my reservations about LaCombe in general -- though capable of a scintillating highlight play, you often need to sit through a few head-scratchers to get there. York is -- though less "talented" -- a far superior prospect to Morrow at this point. York's intelligence and maturity are high-end, and he's a relentless player. I'd say York is the prototypical mid-pairing, two-way prospect for the NHL, and he certainly has 40+ point upside. In fact, I'd say York is the ideal role model for Morrow, whose size, skating and puck skills are all more impressive than York's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AusDev and imMagnum

aboriginal

lou ****ing sucks
Mar 10, 2006
24,809
1,296
LV-426
Morrow is certainly a huge talent, but the only knock on him is not simply competition -- as was the case with Makar and Fabbro. Morrow tends to play a complacent game in knowing how much better he is than the competition, as opposed to Fabbro who always was extremely responsible defensively or Makar who was always trying to outdo his own achievements. Though this is not an indictment of Morrow, it does raise the question of whether he is simply bored playing beneath his level, or whether there are problems with his 200-foot commitment or compete level.

If Morrow answers these questions, he certainly has the potential to be a terrific NHL defenseman, certainly a 3/4 who can head a 2PP at the NHL level. But again, we have to ask the question: why did he not dominate in all aspects of the game playing against kids who did not belong on the same ice as a potential NHL first round pick? Defensively, he was so-so at best, even at a very modest high school level, and as one of the older players in the league.

I agree that Morrow's skill set outshines York and LaCombe. To be honest, I have my reservations about LaCombe in general -- though capable of a scintillating highlight play, you often need to sit through a few head-scratchers to get there. York is -- though less "talented" -- a far superior prospect to Morrow at this point. York's intelligence and maturity are high-end, and he's a relentless player. I'd say York is the prototypical mid-pairing, two-way prospect for the NHL, and he certainly has 40+ point upside. In fact, I'd say York is the ideal role model for Morrow, whose size, skating and puck skills are all more impressive than York's.

dont you just brush aside lacombe like that!
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad