LadyStanley
Registered User
(Where's the Forbes rankings?)
What? Of course they're not, they are a small market. They are good hockey fans but Winnipeg is small and even Winnipeg defenders would agree with that.Winnipeg not at the top of league franchise valuations is very not shocking.
The poster you are responding to has had a bug up their butt about Winnipeg for as long as I can remember and will find any excuse to disparage the city.What? Of course they're not, they are a small market. They are good hockey fans but Winnipeg is small and even Winnipeg defenders would agree with that.
Oh wait a minute I recognize him now, he's the guy that basically has Canada in the same category as North Korea.The poster you are responding to has had a bug up their butt about Winnipeg for as long as I can remember and will find any excuse to disparage the city.
Winnipeg not at the top of league franchise valuations is very not shocking.
Thanks tips lol.Winnipeg not at the top of league franchise valuations is very not shocking.
The fact Arizona went up 45% (as the list says) is pretty remarkable given their arena situation.In fact I'm a little surprised they're ranked as highly as they are. I mean obviously Arizona is #32, I've never been bit on Florida's long-term future either, but ahead of Buffalo?
Several people pointed out that the valuation of the Sens is wrong though - Andlauer bought 90% of the team for $950 million, which means the entire team is worth $1.055 billion. And while normally these team valuations are estimates only, since you have the Senators sold just a month ago that pretty much is the definition of how much they're worth.
The fact Arizona went up 45% (as the list says) is pretty remarkable given their arena situation.
But if the $675 million figure is correct Alex Meruelo has more than doubled the value of the Coyotes than what Forbes estimated he paid for it.
I think it comes down to being the same or hair over an expansion team cost.Not necessarily. I think it comes down to two rather simple things:
1. Mullett Arena has not been a complete disaster. With such a small capacity it's mostly full, and tickets sell at high prices. Last year was their first going into Mullett, so you had no idea how they would be doing.
2. Rising tide raises all boats. If the Senators have increased in value, then so have the Coyotes.
I think it comes down to being the same or hair over an expansion team cost.
Not necessarily. I think it comes down to two rather simple things:
1. Mullett Arena has not been a complete disaster. With such a small capacity it's mostly full, and tickets sell at high prices. Last year was their first going into Mullett, so you had no idea how they would be doing.
2. Rising tide raises all boats. If the Senators have increased in value, then so have the Coyotes.
As far as the arena is concerned, after the 2021-22 season, the Coyotes were ejected from playing in what is now called Desert Diamond Arena in Glendale, Ariz., over a lease dispute. Last season, the Coyotes lost in excess of $10 million playing in Mullett Arena on the campus of Arizona State, even though seats were priced high—on average, $160 a ticket. Bettman called playing in the college arena at best a short-term solution, and they have one more season beyond this one to go on their lease.
I would count being $10,000,000 in the red a pretty big disaster. Those numbers weren't seen since the darkest days of the Coyotes. Ticket revenue being up helps the league but the other costs and loss of several revenue streams is extremely painful for the team.
I think "not being a complete disaster" a was pretty measured comment, and hardly an endorsement of Mullett Arena. But nevertheless several people (myself included) thought it would be a complete apocalypse of a season for the Coyotes.
(Where's the Forbes rankings?)