Disagree, Brodz and Upshall need to be shopped. Admittedly, I don't think we get much for them, but it clears up spots for younger, faster players(Musil, Blais, Sundqvist) and changes the vocal dynamic in the room. Brodz and Upshall have been here for years now and they are part of the veteran leadership group that needs some head banging. May not be the kind of "impact move" people want, but it's the kind of moves that shake up a lockerroom.
I can't argue with that in general. But Brodziak is one of the players whose effort and overall game I don't question, especially relative to his role. He's been one of the most consistent players on the team and is one of a few guys who has actually upped his game whenever he's been moved up the lineup. I have to wonder if you're going to ship someone out to shake things up, should it be a player like that to send a bigger message to the underachievers, or does it make more sense to trade an underachiever as a clear example of what won't be tolerated? I already greatly question the media and fan "leadership" narrative, so even if we're committing to moves for morale purposes, I don't know how we settle on what approach works for a successful shake-up.
On that subject, if leadership really is so important, why don't we hear more cohesive stories from former players about a good lockerroom turning bad or a bad lockerroom turning good? It doesn't need to be some gossipy scoop with specific names, but at least something concrete. The more media obsesses over this concept of stoic traditionalist leadership, the fewer details we get about what that actually means for a room full of professionals who are mostly adults and should damnwell know what to do on the ice.
It's possible that there's simply great parity in the league, so confidence is a bigger factor than ever. The Blues looked lost when February rolled around last year, too, but then Yeo took over, Allen stood on his head, and the Blues got a lot of depth support out of nowhere. Berglund, Barbashev, Sanford, and Paajarvi did some real lifting. Is that confidence down to leadership? Is it coaching? Is it just the goaltending?
It seems like the fact that they keep going back to Allen means that Yeo thinks solving that puzzle is ultimately more important than starting the guy who is actually performing. Maybe he's right, but maybe the message the players get from that is that they sink or swim with their goalie, so it doesn't matter how they play. We can rationalize our way into almost any criticism in this situation.