I think there's a chance that Kane could tell Chicago something like "I'm willing to go to New York (or other places) if you get a deal you like. Otherwise, I'm happy staying here."
He might be mad enough to take the Blackhawks out of Bedard contention which is the real danger.
I can imagine a motivated Kane saying "ok if you want to keep me then let's win"
I would find it honestly hilarious if Chicago kept Kane, won 5 more games then they should have, and end up picking 4th Overall instead of getting Bedard.
What an honorable hill to die on. I am all for Bedard going to Columbus or Anaheim instead.
Good for you? Where you want Bedard to go matters to no one.He might be mad enough to take the Blackhawks out of Bedard contention which is the real danger.
I can imagine a motivated Kane saying "ok if you want to keep me then let's win"
I would find it honestly hilarious if Chicago kept Kane, won 5 more games then they should have, and end up picking 4th Overall instead of getting Bedard.
What an honorable hill to die on. I am all for Bedard going to Columbus or Anaheim instead.
The Rangers had already passed on Kane. I'm not sure why we became the bad guy here. It feels like tons of misdirected anger that should be at directed Kane for how he is handling this, or ownership for giving him such a strict NMC.Even worse from all indications nothing of value is on table for Kane
Hawks need to walk away and not be Rangers dumping ground
It is decent, but when your expectations were Lafreniere, Othmann, 1st+++ and there are dozens of pages in Kane threads that have these insane asks, that deal might as well be table scraps.If the Hawks could get a 2nd, Kravtsov and Jones, I would consider that a decent haul. Probably won't make Hawks fans happy, but those are two good prospects.
Lafreniere sucks. Terrible plan.If the Rangers play games and lowball as LeBrun is hoping (he has no sources he’s just guessing) tell them to pound sand, ask Kane if he wants to go somewhere else or would prefer to remain in Chicago, if no then ask if he wants to re-sign on a new deal. Regardless of that, offer sheet Lafreniere into the moon and promise him first line ice time and power play team that the Rangers won’t give him.
Just because chicago doesn't get anything by not trading him doesn't make it a problemYea, let Kane keep winning games for the Hawks so their draft position also gets worse, along with getting nothing for Kane as well when he walks in the offseason. Seems like a good plan.
I think there's a chance that Kane could tell Chicago something like "I'm willing to go to New York (or other places) if you get a deal you like. Otherwise, I'm happy staying here."
This happens every single year with the best UFAs. And every year the team's fans try to paint it as the opposite.Also, certain players have earned the right to have their teams honor the players wishes even if a maximization of the return isn't occurring. Patrick Kane is one of those players.
This happens every single year with the best UFAs. And every year the team's fans try to paint it as the opposite.
Chicago will accommodate Patrick Kane's wishes. He has earned it as a franchise icon. Tale as old as time.
Patrick Kane gives absolutely zero shits about Chicago finding the best trade return for him. Kane is not going to Carolina or Seattle just because he really wants to help the Chicago Blackhawks get the best return. He earned a NMC for a reason. That clause means the club is indebted to him. They understand that and will 100% accommodate him.
It just happened with Tarasenko. It just happened with ROR. It always happens that way. And part of that is a gentleman's agreement among GMs that they will pay reasonable value even in that case. It works.
Your first and second statements are the same. Kane earned the right to say "It's NYR or nothing".He earned his NMC to protect himself from being traded
He has earned no right to dictate to Davidson that he should be traded and for the Rangers trash
Hawks should not accommodate Kane's wishes if its detrimental to teams rebuild effort and getting the Rangers trash as speculated would be just that.
And the best part is that it doesn't matter as Kane wants to be on the Rangers.Reading from Pagnotta that other teams are interested in Kane. Not sure how it will all play out but I love this time of year!
Both situations are easily imagined. Not only would he not lose his job though, it was have zero impact on his standing with the hawks. If we can’t work something out for Kane, oh well. The plan goes forward, possibly with him. Not a big deal either no matter what happens next.Chicago owes Kane to trade him where he wants.
Kane owes nothing to Chicago. Anyways I'm willing to bet that he's not staying in Chicago if he asked them to trade him to the NYR. Could you imagine Davidson getting in front of the media saying Kane wanted to go to NYR but ultimately they decided to keep him against his will because the NYR did not give enough? And then you get a pissed off Kane for his last season in Chicago???
That would be shitshow. He'd lose his job on the spot.
Well said. Plenty of people easily forget the reality of the entire picture and use the excuse Kane nmc he controls if or where he goes.You have to be f***ing joking, they've gave Kane all the time in the world just for him to be salty about NYR getting Tarasenko to still want to go there. Kane is going to be Brodeur 2.0 where he destroyed his legacy just to chase something elsewhere for a few months with how he's handled this poorly.
[MOD]
I don't think based on kanes reaction not to mention the onslaught of news about a injury.And the best part is that it doesn't matter as Kane wants to be on the Rangers.
Look. Chicago overplayed their hand. Rangers made an offer for Kane, Chicago turned it down.
Rangers went and spent on Tarasenko, Motte and Mikkola.
Chicago talked to Kane and realized there is only 2 options. Rangers or nothing. Rangers already showed they are fine with nothing.
Now Chicago is coming hat in hand.
It is what it is. But from all report,s this is the situation.