leafaholix*
Guest
So all those inaccurate projections and rankings were "mistakes"?George Bachul said:OK...now let's not continue this in every thread , although you wanted to make a point of inaccuracy in your post, I will grant you on several points.(Rankings can be off, players can be misjudged, some writers are stronger than others, but regardless of how good a writer is, mistakes are made.)
But, this all comes down to your and The Messenger's insistance that the Leafs are ranked too low at 29. No more, no less. The above quote says one thing in a paraphrased manner.
Mistakes have been made and will continue to be made. That is why this thread was started. HF.com is not perfect, the writers do this "on the side", and aside from the vast audience this website attracts, it's product is often mistake-prone and inaccurate.
The point is that fans of any team should not take these rankings seriously. If your team is ranked #1, there's a 50/50 chance that it will never produce the talent HF.com predicts it to.
I see you cannot take criticism well, no need to put words into my posts.I like criticism that is constructive. I get it all the time from the Nashville board. Guy's fans on the Oiler board ride him on things all the time. But constructive criticism hardly ever starts with "My team..."