Which D core is better?
Ghost-Krug
Spurgeon-Ellis
Barrie-Vatanen
Chara-Weber
Phaneuf-Ekblad
Nurse-McNabb
Ghost-Krug
Spurgeon-Ellis
Barrie-Vatanen
Chara-Weber
Phaneuf-Ekblad
Nurse-McNabb
first off, thats what she said.
on topic, are we talking now or in their primes?
Prime...its #2 and not even close
Now...its #1 by a pretty healthy margin
I feel like there is a better big/strong group of 6 that can be put together.
Pietrangelo and Hedman comes to mind...
Manson too.
I think he was going for the aggressive physical aspect along with size. Guys like Parakyo and Hedman have size, but they aren't really all that physical.Right, the small side has some of the best small defensemen, where the big is all over the place and completely flawed. Guys like Hedman or Parayko or Burns should be in there. Once you include the top big guys, then it's the big guys, no questions asked.
Fair, but there are still others out there that would be better.I think he was going for the aggressive physical aspect along with size. Guys like Parakyo and Hedman have size, but they aren't really all that physical.
OP has it all wrong.
D today needs to be fast, and exit the zone.