coladin
Registered User
- Sep 18, 2009
- 11,816
- 4,504
Yeah, probably...or probably not.The banks he needs to organise a dedicated campaign and travel to in order to lend money from at predatory rates, probably.
Yeah, probably...or probably not.The banks he needs to organise a dedicated campaign and travel to in order to lend money from at predatory rates, probably.
Yeah, probably...or probably not.
A new owner with deep pockets to put up with an empty arena, great plan.
Who says he doesn't have the cash flow? Seems to me like acquiring guys like Duchene, and trading and signing contracts for Ryan and Phaneuf, whether right or not, doesn't speak to cash flow issues. he is just pissed that fans won't pay to watch Karlsson play, but expect him to fork 100$m for him? This isn't a full Molson Center and paying Carey Price. Just as dumb as signing Karlsson when fans don't go to games is financing an arena downtown. Why would any owner in his predicament do that?
CTC was empty in its inaugural season, new arena new shiny toy be damned. And it will be the same with Lebreton
The banks he needs to organise a dedicated campaign and travel to in order to lend money from at predatory rates, probably.
He was roadshowing the debt I imagine. Pretty standard stuff.
Roadshowing an IPO or some form of securities? That's standard stuff.
Roadshowing to find financing because standard lenders won't touch you anymore? Less standard. From what I understand, it does happen, but it's also a sign that there is no liquid capital left.
Can you provide the quote from the RFP that says that? Not a qite from the guy that lost the bid, but the actual part of the RFP that so clearly states this
A new owner with deep pockets that can bring the team downtown is the only way forward IMHO. I am thankful for Melnyks past actions to save the team, understanding that he has gotten a bad shake from the city in the past but it appears he is running this team to the ground now and for that to me he is the problem now.
Oh, because the "guy that lost the bid" is a liar.
Wow, Ottawa is full of liars.
There were other potential owners lining up to buy this team when it was in bankruptcy. Not just Melynk, so we can lay this "he saved the franchise" fairy tale to bed.
So, the NHL provides a low interest line of credit for any teams that need it. I seem to recall reading up to 200 mil but I could be wrong there. Now, when it was initially introduced, there was an issue with CRA and they deemed it a taxible benefit or something to that effect wipping out the gain a team would get, so the canadian teams couldn't really get anything out of it. The article back then suggested the NHL was trying to remedy the situation, not sure if they have, and if I recall, it also suggested the banks Melnyk had been getting his loans from wanted out of sports financing all together, so it might not be a Melnyk thing so much as a sports thing. Purely speculation on my part, but there's not much to go on that I've read.Roadshowing an IPO or some form of securities? That's standard stuff.
Roadshowing to find financing because standard lenders won't touch you anymore? Less standard. From what I understand, it does happen, but it's also a sign that there is no liquid capital left.
Bonk already mentioned Petlz as one.Really? Who were they?
No, because what he said conflicts with what somebody from the winning bid said. I figured since you claimed it was clearly indicated in the RFP, you'd be able to point it out and provide a quote. Instead, you deflect. Not a good look, just saying.
Can the Board of Governors not force Melnyk out of the NHL ? Is Bettman completely powerless here ???
I don't see how they can make Lebreton work with CTC prices
Just because you won't take the word of the President of the Gatineau-based Devcore Canderel DLS, Billionaire businessman André Desmarais and Cirque du Soleil co-founder Guy Laliberté ......... I am........... you can say they're Liars if you want.
I'll also take the Senators owners' word, that his "bid" will not involve public money........ no doubt you will call him a liar also
Melnyk: Downtown arena key to Senators' success - NHL.com - News
Melnyk said the profits that would be generated by the retail and residential parts of his proposal would be invested in the Senators and would be critical to keeping the team competitive.
"We need more than just ticket revenue and sponsorship and that kind of stuff to be able to compete with the big markets. It's as simple as that," Melnyk said.
"[Renting the building from someone else] is a non-starter for a couple of reasons. One is the other revenues from the whole site get plowed into the Senators. I don't need this project for myself. I need it to make a success and my benchmark for success is winning a Stanley Cup. We're 13 years in and I haven't won a Stanley Cup yet. I think Ottawa deserves it. I want them to win. I want us to win and I want my name on the Cup, why not?"
Melnyk said no taxpayers' money would be involved in his proposal.
Bonk already mentioned Petlz as one.
Here's a link suggesting Peltz and up to 10 buyers
The next owner of the Sens? | CBC Sports
Melnyk is not selling the team ........ and has stated so many times in the past year, and we have to get past the dream that some people have, who want a new owner to come in and "save the day" because, for whatever reason, they've come to dislike the current owner.
On what grounds could the BOG be able to force out one of their own??
Don't you understand that Bettman was hired by, and works for the BOG?
This link does not work, for some reason?
Sorry, we can't find the page you requested...
404
Please try again from the homepage.
Are you this thick headed? you still don't know why the hell fans don't like this owner? Seriously, you head is that far in the barbados sand?
...
"Whatever reason" simply means there are many reasons, not all people buy into all of them, and it does not infer I don't know what they are.
Definition of for some/whatever reason
—used to say it isn't known why someone does something
- He is always late, for some/whatever reason.
Common use of the phrase and The Merriam dictionary suggests otherwise;
Definition of FOR SOME/WHATEVER REASON
Sure, but saying "whatever the reason" literally infers that you're not aware of it. that's all. Just trying to help.You would have to be from Mars, and never participated in these forums to not know there are a number of reasons for some people to dislike the owner.......... Whatever the reason.