If you guys want me to add him, I can. I just wasn't sure whether he's still considered a prospect since he's already played 63 NHL games (including playoffs).
Playoffs don't count normally.
I wouldn't add Claesson, I consider him graduated at this point
Like I have said every summer for the last 10 years, the problem is the consensus. Everybody could come with different criterias, that is why we historically used the HF definitions.
So you consider him graduated, but who knows what's the whole Sens board think... Are we going to make a poll to see if Claesson has graduated? If he is, may I ask why is Paul not graduated then? He played 24 games 2 years ago and I think he makes the team this year.
Personally, I always liked the HF criterias because it was not too fast, not too long. 65 NHL games is a pretty good standard to say a player has graduated. Anyway, that's what we did each and every year for the last decade. Are we going to change the methodology all of sudden?
If I were asked to draft our guys in an NHL style draft, that's the order I'd take them. I'm not basing it on 18/19 year old Brown.
Yeah, we definitely have to project their careers here.