Prospect Info: Sens Board Prospect Rankings 2017 (11th)

[SensBrawler]

Sens Prospect Rankings:

1. Thomas Chabot D 6'02'' CAN (Saint John Sea Dogs, QMJHL) 96.67%
2. Colin White C 6'01'' USA (Boston College, NCAA) 85.33%
3. Logan Brown C 6'06'' USA/CAN (Windsor Spitfires, OHL) 79.71%
4. Filip Chlapik C 6'02'' CZE (Charlottetown Islanders, QMJHL) 47.37%
5. Fredrik Claesson D 6'01'' SWE (Ottawa Senators, NHL) 29.17%
6. Shane Bowers C 6'01'' CAN (Waterloo Black Hawks, USHL) 32.00%
7. Christian Jaros D 6'03'' SVK (Lulea HF, SHL) 49.30%
8. Ben Harpur D 6'06'' CAN (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 55.74%
9. Nick Paul C 6'04'' CAN (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 40.58%
10. Francis Perron RW 6'00'' CAN (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 37.50%

2016 Senators Prospects Top 30 + Past Rankings
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=2128929&highlight=

Who should I add next?

Todd Burgess
Joey Daccord
Cody Donaghey
Vincent Dunn
Macoy Erkamps
Miles Gendron
Jordan Hollett
Patrick Sieloff
Kelly Summers

Added Driedger

The poll will be open for 24-48 hours.

Click to read more...

 

[Micklebot]

Voted Hogberg, it will be interesting to see how he does in Belleville this year.

 

[YouGotAStuGoing]

Englund, then Hogberg/Formenton in some order.

 

[operasen]

Englund then Hogberg

 

[Sens of Anarchy]

Voted Hogberg, it will be interesting to see how he does in Belleville this year.

Not even a given that Hogberg plays in Belleville... Driedger has a chance to beat him out.

 

[OgieO]

I'm high on the Hog(berg)! (but I totally understand him being this low, goalies are friggin impossible).

 

[Deku]

Voting Englund for the 3rd straight poll

 

[edguy]

Englund being severely under rated here...

Englund
Hogberg
Formenton
Wolanin
Lajoie

Add Gendron

 

[Sens of Anarchy]

2016 rankings 1-29; What a difference a year makes

1. Thomas Chabot D 6'02'' CAN (Saint John Sea Dogs, QMJHL) 56.04%
2. Logan Brown C 6'06'' USA/CAN (Windsor Spitfires, OHL) 61.90%
3. Colin White C 6'01'' USA (Boston College, HE) 95.65%
4. Francis Perron RW 6'00'' CAN (Rouyn-Noranda Huskies, QMJHL) 44.07%
5. Nick Paul C 6'04'' CAN (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 68.35%
6. Jonathan Dahlen LW 5'11'' SWE (Timra IK, Allsvenskan) 56.18%
7. Andreas Englund D 6'04'' SWE (Djurgardens IF, SHL) 26.39% (Won Tiebreaker)
8. Gabriel Gagne RW 6'05'' CAN (Victoriaville Tigres/Shawinigan Cataractes, QMJHL) 39.44%
9. Marcus Hogberg G 6'05'' SWE (Linkoping HC, SHL) 30.14% (Won Tiebreaker)
10. Christian Jaros D 6'03'' SVK (Lulea HF, SHL) 40.85%
11. Ryan Dzingel LW 6'00'' USA (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 45.61%
12. Matt Puempel LW 6'02'' CAN (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 50.00%
13. Filip Chlapik C 6'01'' CZE (Charlottetown Islanders, QMJHL) 54.17%
14. Fredrik Claesson D 6'00'' SWE (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 37.84% (Won Tiebreaker)
15. Matt O'Connor G 6'06'' CAN (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 62.16%
16. Max McCormick LW 5'11'' USA (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 26.09%
17. Chris Driedger G 6'04'' CAN (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 34.09%
18. Filip Ahl LW 6'04'' SWE (HV71, SHL/Sundsvall IF, Allsvenskan) 44.83%
19. Maxime Lajoie D 6'01'' CAN (Swift Current Broncos, WHL) 36.84%
20. Ben Harpur D 6'06'' CAN (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 36.59%
21. Patrick Sieloff D 6'01'' USA (Stockton Heat, AHL) 33.33%
22. Buddy Robinson RW 6'05'' USA (Binghamton Senators, AHL) 33.33%
23. Joel Daccord G USA 6'03'' (Muskegon Lumberjacks, USHL) 27.59%
24. Markus Nurmi RW FIN 6'04'' (TPS U20, Jr. A SM liiga) 26.09%
25. Christian Wolanin D USA 6'02'' (University of North Dakota, NCHC) 29.41%
26. Todd Burgess C USA 6'02'' (Fairbanks Ice Dogs, NAHL) 47.37%
27. Miles Gendron D USA/CAN 6'03'' (University of Connecticut, HE) 50.00%
28. Kelly Summers D CAN 6'02'' (Clarkson University, ECAC) 41.18%
29. Macoy Erkamps D CAN 6'00'' (Brandon Wheat Kings, WHL) 50.00%

 

[MaxTheLimit]

Voted Englund. Been thinking of Hogberg for a while, but with goalies...I just don't know.

 

[tony d]

Hogberg.

 

[bert]

I like Formenton here. Englund thus far has just been too soft, he needs a physical edge if he has such limited offensize and puck moving ability.

 

[aragorn]

Englund, then Hogberg/Formenton in some order.

I agree. Perron & Claesson don't belong in the top 10 IMO.

 

[Grizz MacArthur]

Hogberg, then Englund, then Formenton.

Add - Miles Gendron, I guess.

 

[WadeRedden]

Englund.

Maybe I missed it, but why is Claesson on this list? He's like a fifth year pro on a one-way deal next year. He's not a prospect anymore. He's a legit member of our top-6.

 

[Sens of Anarchy]

Englund.

Maybe I missed it, but why is Claesson on this list? He's like a fifth year pro on a one-way deal next year. He's not a prospect anymore. He's a legit member of our top-6.

Either just cuz or love for Claesson I guess

 

[SensBrawler]

Englund.

Maybe I missed it, but why is Claesson on this list? He's like a fifth year pro on a one-way deal next year. He's not a prospect anymore. He's a legit member of our top-6.

Technically he's still a prospect by HF standards since he's under 25 and hasn't played 65 NHL games yet. We've done it that way in the past, so I decided to include him to stay consistent.

 

[ZekeA]

Englund......................

Going with Englund yet again.....................

 

[LeProspector]

Englund add Wikstrand

 

[Benjamin]

No wrong voting at this point.

With that being said, Englund is the incorrect choice.

 

[Sun God Nika]

Englund
Formenton
Hogberg
--
Batherson

Thats a solid top 12 right there.

 

[Nac Mac Feegle]

Englund seems to be the safest bet right now.

That Formenton kid is so intriguing....but just haven't seen enough ot him yet to know what we have in him.

 

[YouGotAStuGoing]

No wrong voting at this point.

With that being said, Englund is the incorrect choice.

30 people disagree.

I think we're starting to get to that murky middle of the pack, I don't think that'll come until after Englund, Formenton and Hogberg are off the board.

 

[DrunkUncleDenis]

Englund, then Hogberg/Formenton in some order.

Yup.

England
Pig
Fermentation

 

[Sens of Anarchy]

No wrong voting at this point.

With that being said, Englund is the incorrect choice.

Why do you say that?