Sensfourlife
Registered User
- Aug 22, 2020
- 194
- 104
Not a bad suggestion. Seems pretty fair value wise.Ott:
Garland
Arizona:
L.Brown
Brannstrom
2nd
And Ottawa adds A LOT more because it’s laughable to suggest Brannstrom returns a 1C. He’s not the base in such a trade. chabot would be.If you're offering Brannstrom, it needs to be in a package for a 1C
Lol, no Chabot would not be the base in such a trade.And Ottawa adds A LOT more because it’s laughable to suggest Brannstrom returns a 1C. He’s not the base in such a trade. chabot would be.
You win some, you lose some. He generally sucks at trading, but Stone was a pending UFA and Dorion left it to the 11th hour.Imagine trading Mark Stone for what eventually ends up being only Conor Garland just a couple years later.
If I'm the NHL I'm investigating Pierre Dorion because that's straight sabotaging a franchise
I tell you what. I don't hate it. Don't love it. But I would covet all three of those pieces from Ottawa.Ott:
Garland
Arizona:
L.Brown
Brannstrom
2nd