Well said.He is very dynamic and plays unlike any of our young forwards or players in general. He hounds pucks like a madman and creates havoc on almost every one of his shifts due to his tenacity and hockey IQ. The puck seems to follow him around and his feet are always moving. I don't know if he'll ever be an elite offensive threat (80-90 point seasons), but he should be able to play and produce with high end players and rack up points with his relentless puck pursuit and net drives. EXACTLY what our prospect pool needed, love this pick.
in case you missed the action
they are full game shift by shift packages (~97%)
for highlight shiny stuff are in the description
Will he be a solid NHLer or not, that's the question, it's hard to answer on right now, but how could it happen, that he was picked #10 and Dorofeyev was picked in the 3rd...
He is very dynamic and plays unlike any of our young forwards or players in general. He hounds pucks like a madman and creates havoc on almost every one of his shifts due to his tenacity and hockey IQ. The puck seems to follow him around and his feet are always moving. I don't know if he'll ever be an elite offensive threat (80-90 point seasons), but he should be able to play and produce with high end players and rack up points with his relentless puck pursuit and net drives. EXACTLY what our prospect pool needed, love this pick.
That's not really the question. The question is will he be more Landeskog or Colin Wilson in the NHL; i.e. will he be a highend scoring liner or just a solid middle-6 guy that does all of the little things that get a fella opportunities that are above his station.
And he went higher than Dorofeyev because his game/skillset projects much better to the NHL, once fully developed, than do Doro's. That's why it doesn't matter what each one did in the MHL last season, or even how far along either one is now. In the end Dorofeyev's skillset & game just don't project to the NHL nearly as well as they do to the KHL, while the inverse is true of Podkolzin's game & tools...and then there's the disparity in where they are in their growth curves & the untapped potential that they still realistically have access to.
But you can continue to ignore the difference who is the better youth player atm & who will be the better NHLer in their primes if you'd prefer...it's exactly what you did with Denisenko in his draft year; when you refused to listen to those of us that loved him despite his similarly middling MHL totals
I see this is turning into a silly debate again.
Absolutely nobody here knows how either will turn out and which player is better suited for the NHL.
And a Panarin vs Yakupov example is incredibly dumb as well.
I had Zegras at 3/4 in the draft so you can imagine how excited i was getting before Anahiem crushed my dreamsI like this pick for Vancouver alot as a partial Canucks fan, gives Vancouver a franchise winger to play alongside Petterssen and even though it'll be a few years down the road from now when he makes his debut it also means it will be longer before they have to re-sign Podkolzin. So Loui Eriksson will be off the books by then and they can make a big splash in UFA signings for Podkolzin's sophmore season.
Kinda funny how Edmonton helped out two teams in the pacific by picking Broberg thus causing their rivals to draft better players.
I cheered when they took Broberg then cried at the next two picks.Kinda funny how Edmonton helped out two teams in the pacific by picking Broberg thus causing their rivals to draft better players.
Kinda funny how Edmonton helped out two teams in the pacific by picking Broberg thus causing their rivals to draft better players.
Yeah i guess & to be fair they at least didn't trade up like Arizona did for Soderstrom, I think Bro is a tier above Soderstrom.As an Oil fan who wanted Zegras, I’d suggest we wait until the dust settles to make a claim the the Oilers “helped” the Nucks and Ducks by taking Broberg. Considering your a fan of a team who reached for Lindholm in 2012 and had it work fantastically, I would hope you’d appreciate that Broberg has the potential to follow a similar development trajectory. Both players (Broberg and Lindholm) received a lot of praise after the interview portion of the combine based on an extremely high level of maturity.
I think all 3 teams are quite happy with who they chose and it will be fun to look back 5 years from now to examine who the BPA was in those consecutive picks.
Oh yes, I've seen these arguments so many times... Because of them Yakupov was picked 1st OA and Panarin wasn't picked at all, and look, how it's ended up...
Yeah, it's as dumb as the logic, that one player is more suitable for the NHL, than the other, because he's bigger, heavier, tougher, hits harder, drives the puck more directly to the goals etc...
They will probably send him around all year long. VHL season only starts on Friday so SKA did some interesting things, most notably dressing Kochetkov and Melnichuk as goalies, that's supposed to be their VHL tandem.Would he be better off in the VHL where he can play big minutes? I think it could be good idea since his playing time is very limited right now.
They will probably send him around all year long. VHL season only starts on Friday so SKA did some interesting things, most notably dressing Kochetkov and Melnichuk as goalies, that's supposed to be their VHL tandem.
Every SKA goalie is tearing it up at their level, the last 4 years or so, at least. Nothing new here. I think Askarov's chances to play anywhere else but MHL is next to none unless there are injuries. At this point, he is quite firmly the 6th goalie in the system.Watch out for Askarov. He's been tearing it up for SKA-1946 during the preseason.