780il
edm
He's talking about Joakim NygardI tried to look this guy up but only got the Joakim Ryan from San Jose.
There has to be some stats on this guy somewhere. Anyone out there can find a link that would be great.
He's talking about Joakim NygardI tried to look this guy up but only got the Joakim Ryan from San Jose.
There has to be some stats on this guy somewhere. Anyone out there can find a link that would be great.
I tried to look this guy up but only got the Joakim Ryan from San Jose.
There has to be some stats on this guy somewhere. Anyone out there can find a link that would be great.
The topic of conversation is passing through the neutral zone though, which is the consistent shot at Kris Russell to completely discredit the player. Darnell Nurse is a fantastic defensemen in terms of moving the puck himself with possession. He leads the team in zone entries clearly because he has the confidence to carry the puck for extended periods. When it comes to passing specifically, it's unquestionably the weakest part of his game. Unforced icings are Darnell's forte.
Another gem from Matty
Matheson is senile.
Hes talking about Joakim Nygard, who was one of 2 SHL players last year to score 20 goals. He will sign either with us or Calgary soon.
He's talking about Joakim Nygard
its that Nygard guy not Ryan...Jimmy is crazy
I'm using thought to debate with emotion.You're asking a logical question in an illogical industry.
Nurse is better than Russell without question. But 'no tangible value' doesn't explain the collapse this season when he went down for an extended period and our GM at the time was forced to make some less-than-advisable trades to attempt to find a player capable of handling the workload he's been tasked with since he's been signed.
You mean the same period where they lost their actual #1D man?
If you want to know why the Oilers have struggled for the last two seasons, having Kris Russell playing a feature role in the top 4 is a pretty succinct explanation.
Team that can't move the puck loses badly without both Klefbom and Sekera. News @ 11.
No, the six game stretch in late December when the team was poised to hit the 20-win mark at the earliest date since the '85 season. They lost six straight games without either defenseman and headed into the new year at 0.500. Essentially killed the playoff hopes.You mean the same period where they lost their actual #1D man?
If you want to know why the Oilers have struggled for the last two seasons, having Kris Russell playing a feature role in the top 4 is a pretty succinct explanation.
No, the six game stretch in late December when the team was poised to hit the 20-win mark at the earliest date since the '85 season. They lost six straight games without either defenseman and headed into the new year at 0.500. Essentially killed the playoff hopes.
Kris Russell played a 'feature role' in the top four in 16/17. Didn't see much of a problem then. People need to realize that defense is something an entire team is responsible for. Blaming an individual for a team's failure just suggests obvious bias.
The Oilers missing the playoffs wasn't about who we had on defense. It was about who we didn't have.Kris Russell playing a feature role in 16/17 was a huge problem then. I said as much that summer, even went so far as to say the defense as it was constructed was more likely to see the Oilers out of the playoffs than contending when everyone was riding the high.
Only by virtue of that group being insanely healthy were they good enough. Sekera babysitting Russell is part of that in maybe his best all-around NHL season ever was a huge part of that.
It isn't his fault, though. He's just one of many miscast players on the roster. He's just the glaring problem on D.
The Oilers missing the playoffs wasn't about who we had on defense. It was about who we didn't have.
Kris Russell is what he is. A player who gives you minutes in the instance a team doesn't have the depth to cover them. The Oilers' defense has had a significant need at that position for some time. The moment someone pushes him out of that role, he'll likely move on to another organization and be utilized the way he has been in multiple other organizations.
In the meantime, suggesting he is a primary reason for a team's failures is absolute non-sense.
No, the six game stretch in late December when the team was poised to hit the 20-win mark at the earliest date since the '85 season. They lost six straight games without either defenseman and headed into the new year at 0.500. Essentially killed the playoff hopes.
Kris Russell played a 'feature role' in the top four in 16/17. Didn't see much of a problem then. People need to realize that defense is something an entire team is responsible for. Blaming an individual for a team's failure just suggests obvious bias.
The Oilers missing the playoffs wasn't about who we had on defense. It was about who we didn't have.
Kris Russell is what he is. A player who gives you minutes in the instance a team doesn't have the depth to cover them. The Oilers' defense has had a significant need at that position for some time. The moment someone pushes him out of that role, he'll likely move on to another organization and be utilized the way he has been in multiple other organizations.
In the meantime, suggesting he is a primary reason for a team's failures is absolute non-sense.
While McDavid is far (and far ... and far ) away the better player (Draisaitl as well), Klefbom has had a far larger impact on the team's W/L ratio over the past few years. Granted, most of that is due to the Oilers' dearth of players that can play top pairing minutes and not be annihilated, but still...
Klefbom is an important player (when healthy).
I like Nurse ... a lot ... but if he's pulling a Justin Schultz and blowing defensive assignments because he thinks points are what's gonna get him paid - first, he needs to be sat. If he still doesn't get the message, he has value on the trade market, especially if he's demanding $6 mil per year.
I'm pretty sure even Nurse's staunchest supporters on this site will agree he's not a $6 mil D-man.
If these players are so easily found for 'under $4m' why haven't they found them in over a decade? The problem with gauging what a defenseman brings to the table is managing your expectations. I can look at Kris Russell and see the flaws. What I also understand is what happens when a lesser player is cast into his role.Yup they did. However, you can find these stop gap D for less than 4 mil per year. A 4 mil D should be net positive in the top 4. At very best, Russell is net neutral (very rarely), most times hes a net negative
Is nothing about Russell. Hes a fine bottom pairing D. But like you allude to, we need the right D in the right spot. So we need an actual top 4 D in the top 4. And Im not paying 4 mil to a bottom pairing D
Russell is definitely worse than Nurse. Russell adds no tangible value IMO to the team besides 'shot blocks' because he can't get possession and make a pass. Russell getting in the puck in our zone is just a waste of possession.
I just assume he won't ever waive his NMC to leave. It changes to a 10 team NTC next summer though right?
No, the six game stretch in late December when the team was poised to hit the 20-win mark at the earliest date since the '85 season. They lost six straight games without either defenseman and headed into the new year at 0.500. Essentially killed the playoff hopes.
Kris Russell played a 'feature role' in the top four in 16/17. Didn't see much of a problem then.
People need to realize that defense is something an entire team is responsible for. Blaming an individual for a team's failure just suggests obvious bias.
Kris Russell is what he is. A player who gives you minutes in the instance a team doesn't have the depth to cover them.