Proposal: Rumors & Proposals Thread: Will Holland Hit the Ground Running, or With a Thud?

Status
Not open for further replies.

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
41,728
30,217
Ontario
The topic of conversation is passing through the neutral zone though, which is the consistent shot at Kris Russell to completely discredit the player. Darnell Nurse is a fantastic defensemen in terms of moving the puck himself with possession. He leads the team in zone entries clearly because he has the confidence to carry the puck for extended periods. When it comes to passing specifically, it's unquestionably the weakest part of his game. Unforced icings are Darnell's forte.

Narrowing zone exits down to passing doesn't really make sense. The goal is to get it out with control and Nurse is significantly better at it.

And it's used to discredit Russell for good reason. He's a high volume, horrible controlled exit defenseman.
 

Little Fury

Registered User
Jun 21, 2006
17,865
6,883
Nurse is better than Russell without question. But 'no tangible value' doesn't explain the collapse this season when he went down for an extended period and our GM at the time was forced to make some less-than-advisable trades to attempt to find a player capable of handling the workload he's been tasked with since he's been signed.

You mean the same period where they lost their actual #1D man?

If you want to know why the Oilers have struggled for the last two seasons, having Kris Russell playing a feature role in the top 4 is a pretty succinct explanation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SK13

SK13

non torsii subligarium
Jul 23, 2007
32,762
6,382
Edmonton
You mean the same period where they lost their actual #1D man?

If you want to know why the Oilers have struggled for the last two seasons, having Kris Russell playing a feature role in the top 4 is a pretty succinct explanation.

Team that can't move the puck loses badly without both Klefbom and Sekera. News @ 11.
 

belair

Balls On The Crest
Apr 9, 2010
38,699
21,948
Canada
You mean the same period where they lost their actual #1D man?

If you want to know why the Oilers have struggled for the last two seasons, having Kris Russell playing a feature role in the top 4 is a pretty succinct explanation.
No, the six game stretch in late December when the team was poised to hit the 20-win mark at the earliest date since the '85 season. They lost six straight games without either defenseman and headed into the new year at 0.500. Essentially killed the playoff hopes.

Kris Russell played a 'feature role' in the top four in 16/17. Didn't see much of a problem then. People need to realize that defense is something an entire team is responsible for. Blaming an individual for a team's failure just suggests obvious bias.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jamin

SK13

non torsii subligarium
Jul 23, 2007
32,762
6,382
Edmonton
No, the six game stretch in late December when the team was poised to hit the 20-win mark at the earliest date since the '85 season. They lost six straight games without either defenseman and headed into the new year at 0.500. Essentially killed the playoff hopes.

Kris Russell played a 'feature role' in the top four in 16/17. Didn't see much of a problem then. People need to realize that defense is something an entire team is responsible for. Blaming an individual for a team's failure just suggests obvious bias.

Kris Russell playing a feature role in 16/17 was a huge problem then. I said as much that summer, even went so far as to say the defense as it was constructed was more likely to see the Oilers out of the playoffs than contending when everyone was riding the high.

Only by virtue of that group being insanely healthy were they good enough. Sekera babysitting Russell in maybe his best all-around NHL season ever was another huge part of why it worked.

It isn't his fault, though. He's just one of many miscast players on the roster. He's just the glaring problem on D.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmi McJenkins

belair

Balls On The Crest
Apr 9, 2010
38,699
21,948
Canada
Kris Russell playing a feature role in 16/17 was a huge problem then. I said as much that summer, even went so far as to say the defense as it was constructed was more likely to see the Oilers out of the playoffs than contending when everyone was riding the high.

Only by virtue of that group being insanely healthy were they good enough. Sekera babysitting Russell is part of that in maybe his best all-around NHL season ever was a huge part of that.

It isn't his fault, though. He's just one of many miscast players on the roster. He's just the glaring problem on D.
The Oilers missing the playoffs wasn't about who we had on defense. It was about who we didn't have.

Kris Russell is what he is. A player who gives you minutes in the instance a team doesn't have the depth to cover them. The Oilers' defense has had a significant need at that position for some time. The moment someone pushes him out of that role, he'll likely move on to another organization and be utilized the way he has been in multiple other organizations.

In the meantime, suggesting he is a primary reason for a team's failures is absolute non-sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 Mins 4 Ftg

SK13

non torsii subligarium
Jul 23, 2007
32,762
6,382
Edmonton
The Oilers missing the playoffs wasn't about who we had on defense. It was about who we didn't have.

Yes, we didn't have a fourth actual top-4 defenseman or any injury coverage for Andrej Sekera.

Kris Russell is what he is. A player who gives you minutes in the instance a team doesn't have the depth to cover them. The Oilers' defense has had a significant need at that position for some time. The moment someone pushes him out of that role, he'll likely move on to another organization and be utilized the way he has been in multiple other organizations.

In the meantime, suggesting he is a primary reason for a team's failures is absolute non-sense.

He's utilized here the same way Calgary utilized him to their own detriment. In a top-4 role, causing massive possession loss with a partner that makes too many mistakes to spend that much time in his own zone.

He's NOT the primary reason for the teams failure. He is a bad mix for this defense, misused in the top-4 and too expensive for this cap situation. Which is why I think he's the clear problem on D right now.
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
No, the six game stretch in late December when the team was poised to hit the 20-win mark at the earliest date since the '85 season. They lost six straight games without either defenseman and headed into the new year at 0.500. Essentially killed the playoff hopes.

Kris Russell played a 'feature role' in the top four in 16/17. Didn't see much of a problem then. People need to realize that defense is something an entire team is responsible for. Blaming an individual for a team's failure just suggests obvious bias.

No he didnt. Sekera dragged him around the ice and was the only reason Russell looked like a top 4 D. No surprise than when Sekera was out, Russell imploded. Same thing happened to Benning. Only difference, Benning is a young D and doesnt make 4 mil
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
The Oilers missing the playoffs wasn't about who we had on defense. It was about who we didn't have.

Kris Russell is what he is. A player who gives you minutes in the instance a team doesn't have the depth to cover them. The Oilers' defense has had a significant need at that position for some time. The moment someone pushes him out of that role, he'll likely move on to another organization and be utilized the way he has been in multiple other organizations.

In the meantime, suggesting he is a primary reason for a team's failures is absolute non-sense.

Yup they did. However, you can find these stop gap D for less than 4 mil per year. A 4 mil D should be net positive in the top 4. At very best, Russell is net neutral (very rarely), most times hes a net negative

Is nothing about Russell. Hes a fine bottom pairing D. But like you allude to, we need the right D in the right spot. So we need an actual top 4 D in the top 4. And Im not paying 4 mil to a bottom pairing D
 

Aceboogie

Registered User
Aug 25, 2012
32,649
3,896
While McDavid is far (and far ... and far ) away the better player (Draisaitl as well), Klefbom has had a far larger impact on the team's W/L ratio over the past few years. Granted, most of that is due to the Oilers' dearth of players that can play top pairing minutes and not be annihilated, but still...

Klefbom is an important player (when healthy).

I like Nurse ... a lot ... but if he's pulling a Justin Schultz and blowing defensive assignments because he thinks points are what's gonna get him paid - first, he needs to be sat. If he still doesn't get the message, he has value on the trade market, especially if he's demanding $6 mil per year.

I'm pretty sure even Nurse's staunchest supporters on this site will agree he's not a $6 mil D-man.

Agree with alot of this. However, like Schultz, I think Nurse is handicapped due his spot in the line up. Schultz was played to high, Nurse is played with a struggling partner

I agree though that hes not a 6mil D and Klefbom is a better option. I prefer to keep both in the end
 

belair

Balls On The Crest
Apr 9, 2010
38,699
21,948
Canada
Yup they did. However, you can find these stop gap D for less than 4 mil per year. A 4 mil D should be net positive in the top 4. At very best, Russell is net neutral (very rarely), most times hes a net negative

Is nothing about Russell. Hes a fine bottom pairing D. But like you allude to, we need the right D in the right spot. So we need an actual top 4 D in the top 4. And Im not paying 4 mil to a bottom pairing D
If these players are so easily found for 'under $4m' why haven't they found them in over a decade? The problem with gauging what a defenseman brings to the table is managing your expectations. I can look at Kris Russell and see the flaws. What I also understand is what happens when a lesser player is cast into his role.

The 'problem' isn't that Kris Russell is an Edmonton Oiler. It's that the Oilers aren't confident that they have the ability to replace the minutes he's consistently provided for them over the previous three seasons.

Two years in a row we've seen significant injuries limit the availability of Andrej Sekera and Oscar Klefbom. If I'm playing the odds...
 

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
16,980
6,642
Halifax
Russell is definitely worse than Nurse. Russell adds no tangible value IMO to the team besides 'shot blocks' because he can't get possession and make a pass. Russell getting in the puck in our zone is just a waste of possession.

I just assume he won't ever waive his NMC to leave. It changes to a 10 team NTC next summer though right?


No it changes this summer to 10 team next summer it is 15 teams
 

Little Fury

Registered User
Jun 21, 2006
17,865
6,883
No, the six game stretch in late December when the team was poised to hit the 20-win mark at the earliest date since the '85 season. They lost six straight games without either defenseman and headed into the new year at 0.500. Essentially killed the playoff hopes.

Getting warmer...

Kris Russell played a 'feature role' in the top four in 16/17. Didn't see much of a problem then.

I did! it helped that he was paired with a vastly superior D man. We've seen what happens without that cover.

People need to realize that defense is something an entire team is responsible for. Blaming an individual for a team's failure just suggests obvious bias.

Some individuals are a bigger part of the problem than others.

Kris Russell is what he is. A player who gives you minutes in the instance a team doesn't have the depth to cover them.

What happens in those minutes is kinda important. When Russell is on the ice, the Oilers get consistently outshot, outchanced and frequently outscored. You can't just brush that off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad