The problem with out of market criticism from ignoramous US-and-Toronto based media is they only have the broad strokes. They don't have any nuance or detail work, and they don't have the ethic or professionalism to seek information in the same way a Bob McKenzie or more local MSM type would. Regardless of what you may think of someone like Mark Spector, if it was HE who was giving the Oilers F- grades for their offseason work, that would at least come from a place of situational understanding and not some gut reaction from a playground pundit looking for some sweeping move or moves to praise or deride.
A good example is, could you honestly see someone like Mark Spector writing up the Oilers top-10 prospects this spring and leaving Tyler Benson off the list? THN did. Do you think that THN understands that the Oilers could not kill penalties, and had no depth scorers hit 10 goals, and signed a whack of cost effective players that help this? Do you think they understand the superiority of 20-25 year old Jones, Bear, Persson, Lagesson, Bouchard and Samourkov as depth options as compared to Gryba, Auvitu, Garrison, Gravel, Petrovic and Manning? Do you think they understand the cap implications of the Lucic-Neal trade and depth work versus, say, overpaying Gustav Nyquist or Mark Ferlund?
I would be curious to see what they think of Vancouver's offseason. I think that was incredibly poor work by VAN and I'm wondering how they saw that.