Indrid Cold
Registered User
- Oct 24, 2022
- 384
- 378
I don't know if I would be willing to part with Kasper, but what is the most you would give up for him, if anything at all?
I like Kasper as much as the next guy.I don't know if I would be willing to part with Kasper, but what is the most you would give up for him, if anything at all?
I don't have words for that trade package... Pettersson doesn't move the needle enough to overcome losing those pieces of our immediate future. Not even remotely close.I get stupid when I hear Petterson and go Kasper, Edvinsson and a 2024 first.
It's why I'm not a GM lol.
I get stupid when I hear Petterson and go Kasper, Edvinsson and a 2024 first.
It's why I'm not a GM lol.
I'm aware of my stupidness when it comes to Petterson. But he does have 50 pts in 39 games and is 12th in scoring. Elite young players usually cost.I don't have words for that trade package... Pettersson doesn't move the needle enough to overcome losing those pieces of our immediate future. Not even remotely close.
I'd rather have 2 than 1. I'm super high on Ed and Kasper.I'm aware of my stupidness when it comes to Petterson. But he does have 50 pts in 39 games and is 12th in scoring. Elite young players usually cost.
So do you think Kasper has Petterson upside? I'm not trying to be sarcastic or anything. I know Edvinsson has top 2 defender potential.I'd rather have 2 than 1. I'm super high on Ed and Kasper.
I think Kasper will be a slightly slower but more physically assertive Larkin.So do you think Kasper has Petterson upside? I'm not trying to be sarcastic or anything. I know Edvinsson has top 2 defender potential.
Where is this rumor coming from?
I get stupid when I hear Petterson and go Kasper, Edvinsson and a 2024 first.
The two extremes of trade proposals lol.Veleno + Berggren + 1st? Throw in Zadina?
I'd say it's the $64M questions, but I think the $64M is already the answer. They have to be committed to adding players that will help them right now and the short term. Taking futures just burns away the Miller deal.The two extremes of trade proposals lol.
It all depends on what Vancouver wants to do. Do they want to compete? Rebuild? Re-tool?
But proposal #1 is way too much, and proposal #2 not nearly enough.
Do you have any reason to believe he isn't?I'll add that Yzerman needs to be all over situations like these.
i prefer Edvinson over Petterson on one on one trade.I get stupid when I hear Petterson and go Kasper, Edvinsson and a 2024 first.
It's why I'm not a GM lol.
Congratulations, you have an opinion that will be pretty unique.i prefer Edvinson over Petterson on one on one trade.
This wouldn’t even be closeI'd love to add Pettersson. I dont believe he will be traded and even if we were I dont see Detroit being in a position to make the best offer. For shits and giggles
Veleno + Berggren + 1st? Throw in Zadina?
As much as I like Berggren you gotta give to get. With Rasmussen looking like a better winger for now Berggren could be expendable. It stings but would still leave you something along the lines of:
Ras - Larkin - Ray
Kubalik/Fabbri - EP - Perron
Kasper - Copp - Kubalik/Fabbri
Sunny - XXX - Erne
Sign someone like Glendening or Frederick Gaudreau to plug into the 4th line.
We absolutely cannot take on the OEL contract. Mo, Ray, Ras, Hronek, Veleno need new contracts after next season and I believe OEL has 4 more years on his.Any chance you lessen the blow by taking on the OEL contract? Would Vancouver even bother with that?
This isn’t a bad idea. It’s a huge, shitty contract but it could mean we part with much less. I doubt Van does it though, if they trade Petterson and Horvat leaves, they’re back in a full rebuild so there’s no reason to push to get rid of OEL.Any chance you lessen the blow by taking on the OEL contract? Would Vancouver even bother with that?