cybresabre
prōject positivity
Say that if you want, but I'm still going to wait for @dotcommunism to confirm it.Whether on the ice, or behind the cash register, his $650k contract wouldn't count against the cap anyway. :sarcasm
Say that if you want, but I'm still going to wait for @dotcommunism to confirm it.Whether on the ice, or behind the cash register, his $650k contract wouldn't count against the cap anyway. :sarcasm
I'm going with djp's info on this one.Say that if you want, but I'm still going to wait for @dotcommunism to confirm it.
I think they can find people to work at the Sabres store for less than $650k.
Hey guys, just checking in and noticing that Sam Reinhart is set to centre the 3rd line. I picked him up late in fantasy but am thinking about potentially dropping him. Do you guys think he'll get a lot of offensive opportunities? PP time? Thanks!
Expect 20 goals, 40-50 pts. If we struggle he might be moved up to play on Eichels wing.Hey guys, just checking in and noticing that Sam Reinhart is set to centre the 3rd line. I picked him up late in fantasy but am thinking about potentially dropping him. Do you guys think he'll get a lot of offensive opportunities? PP time? Thanks!
And we will have to give up assets to dump him. No one would buy Moulson at his cap hit (even halved) when hes at best 13th firward. I think we might have yo buy him out if they like Kane (or someone else from UFA for his position) long term. Even with bridge for Sam it would be almost impossible fit without a Moulson buyout.Trading Moulson at 50% would give us more cap space than a buyout.
We should bridge Sam. The good thing about a bridge contract is that the third one won't go into 38-year old territory.By my math we need the cap to go up by 2mil to have amy chance to re-sign Kane or similar player next year even with the inevitable Moulson buyout. Hope at least Casey and Alex are ready by then in case we cant afford that expensive winger so that we are not barebones on the wings.
EDIT: unless we bridge Sam, whuch would make things easy. If they like Kane this year I am fully expecting this to happen.
Not much of an issue with Sam. His game will age well.We should bridge Sam. The good thing about a bridge contract is that the third one won't go into 38-year old territory.
Swapping Lehner/Johnson for a cheaper option might help as well.
If Bogo does well we might be able to trade him as well without adding picks. But then Ghule, Antipin and Scandella has to look like legit top four defensemen.
We're at least 3 seasons away from dealing with Nylander/Mittelstadt/Asplund contracts, so after the purge next summer we should have a couple of comfy seasons cap-wise.
Agreed. But I am still pro-bridging him to allow having an extra quality winger without decimating the rest of the team. By now it's quite obvious the kids we were supposed to have in there won't be much more than fringe NHLers. With Sam at wing and if we let Kane go we have not much left...Okposo, Pomer for 1 year, Griffith who is borderline NHLer at this point, Girgs....hopefully Casey and Alex. That's still only 6 wingers so in a couple of years time without re-signed Kane or Similar we are looking at:Not much of an issue with Sam. His game will age well.
Moulson > Nolan, not particularly close.Music to my years, quite possibly I won't have to see Gorges and Moulson skating on the first game. I love our management.
Unless there's an injury before he's healthy, I think ERod is ticketed for Rochester. Waiver exempt? Check. Lengthy layoff allowing for the "he didn't have a full preseason and needs reps" out? Yep. It's just the path of least resistance and furthers the development mantra. He'll be up eventually, though.
I keep seeing lines with Eichel and Mittelstadt. I get the talent level and speed might work together. But chemistry-wise, I never see that type of line reaching potential. Eichel loves the puck on his stick in transition and in the offensive zone. So does Mittelstadt. Mitelstadt isn't the end player that just shoots after someone else does the work. He's the driver of his line too. I don't see those two meshing well.
Eichel needs two wingers who are willing to retrieve the puck, have good hockey sense, and can convert. Players like Girgensons, Asplund, Fasching, Baptiste, etc. are the types of players who need to play on Eichel's wing. And all of those wingers have the ability to play on an Eichel line in the same way Sheary plays with Crosby.
Mittelstadt should be on Reinhart's wing. Reinhart does not need to have the puck to be effective. Reinhart uses positioning, passing, and anticipation to make plays. It worked well with Eichel. It'd work well with Mittelstadt, who can use his speed and skill to take advantage of the situations Reinhart puts him in. Think Domi - Reinhart at the WJCs. The other winger should probably be similar to who plays with Eichel: puck retrieval, hockey sense, can convert. Housley can also use this line to match offensive lines.
Then ROR-Okposo. I think Nylander on that line works great. Nylander also does not need the puck a lot to be great, and he's got the ability, hockey sense, and shot to feed off ROR and Okposo. Nylander is also good defensively, and that line continues to be the line Housley can match against top lines.
If I'm forming future lines, I go with this:
Fasching - Eichel - Asplund
Nylander - ROR - Okposo
Girgensons - Reinhart - Mittelstadt
XXX - Larsson - YYY
Looks like Moulson and Gorges are rotating in on the 4th line and 3rd pairing respectively.
Quoted my post with the lines from yesterday for a reminder.