Nasti
Registered User
Good career but not Hall of Fame worthy. The bar is set pretty high for goalies and he was his generation’s Curtis Joseph.
One of the only Canucks I actually liked during that rivalry. Happy trails Bobby Lou.
The Canucks agreed to the retroactive application of the rule though. They also were given a compliance buyout that would have negated this penalty that they elected not to use. That's not on the league, that's on them.Problem was that Canucks signed the deal under the existing set of rules and then the rules were then changed. It was retroactively applied which violates basic legal principles. Like charging a person for a crime when at the time the person's action were not illegal. That's using the rules or law to punish people and that's what happened to the Canucks. Also irritating that others in the same situation were found ways of maneuvering out of penalties such as with New Jersey and Kowalchuk. And League let it happen.
Way the LTIR has been used has also been discriminatory. Some have obviously abused it with no sanction, and others held to the letter of the law.
Because he has a bad taste for having to spend an extra year there after he asked for a trade. He stuck it in and broke it off. Weber will do the same to Nashville in about three years you think the Canucks have it bad just look at whats going to happen in Nashville. And those who think it could be taken to court the ship has sailed on that. When the owners and players association agreed to that CBA it became binding. Either side could have held out in the lockout to have changes made but did not. The LTIR issue and contract termination issues that the Kings used are stretching the contract and if I were betting will be taken into the next contract. The league is hell bent on a CAP and will do what they have to to keep it and put further restraints on contracts GM's are handing out. The league is not growing rev fast enough to support the large salaries GM's are giving to top players putting them in Cap trouble. Look at Tampa the Leafs even the Preds moved PK to clear 9 mil to make improvement's to the team. Right now a teamhas trouble when they have three guys at 9 mil or more they have to play ELC's are scrubs to remain under the cap and it is directly due to GM's giving out too many years at inflated salary.Could somebody please explain why he didn't go the LTIR way like most other players do. I guess he has $3M in total salary left for next three years. Is he too honest? Or the money is just peanuts for him compared to the hassle of going through a doctor?
Could somebody please explain why he didn't go the LTIR way like most other players do. I guess he has $3M in total salary left for next three years. Is he too honest? Or the money is just peanuts for him compared to the hassle of going through a doctor?
Because he has a bad taste for having to spend an extra year there after he asked for a trade. He stuck it in and broke it off. Weber will do the same to Nashville in about three years you think the Canucks have it bad just look at whats going to happen in Nashville. And those who think it could be taken to court the ship has sailed on that. When the owners and players association agreed to that CBA it became binding. Either side could have held out in the lockout to have changes made but did not. The LTIR issue and contract termination issues that the Kings used are stretching the contract and if I were betting will be taken into the next contract. The league is hell bent on a CAP and will do what they have to to keep it and put further restraints on contracts GM's are handing out. The league is not growing rev fast enough to support the large salaries GM's are giving to top players putting them in Cap trouble. Look at Tampa the Leafs even the Preds moved PK to clear 9 mil to make improvement's to the team. Right now a teamhas trouble when they have three guys at 9 mil or more they have to play ELC's are scrubs to remain under the cap and it is directly due to GM's giving out too many years at inflated salary.
Do you mean they will resend the re-capture penalty from the CBA? That's possible. What do you think max penalty would be then keeping in mind that the recapture was put in to try and curtail length and structure and $ amount of contracts what should be the proper punishment?I think Nashville will be clear, they'll bring this up at the next CBA and the owners may perhaps push for a max penalty.
As one who watched young Lu on countless occasions make 40-45 (can I get 50?) saves a night only to lose 2-1 or 1-0, I will disagree. He's one of the best goalies, ever.If Cujo , Moog and Osgood aren't HHOF worthy then neither should Luongo be IMO
Could somebody please explain why he didn't go the LTIR way like most other players do.
He definitely detailed how what it takes for him to continue to play. Does sound like what guys like Zetterberg went through at the end and what Kesler went through last season.Crazy for me, one of those franchise players that started as a rookie so long after I started following hockey. Makes me feel old lol. I remember having to do a double take when they made him captain
He was just heating up around when I started playing fantasy hockey. In his prime he only sat like 6-8 games a season!
As for the recapture I can only LOL those contracts were shady AF. It seems like he could have went LTIR though wonder why he didn't anyway. Nice career Roberto.
I don't think Florida was trying to move him so much as he is an honest guy who knows his days playing hockey at this level are behind him and he wants to move on to whatever is next.He definitely detailed how what it takes for him to continue to play. Does sound like what guys like Zetterberg went through at the end and what Kesler went through last season.
Not sure why he doesn’t go on ltir. Salary is still low and the Canucks pick up 15% of it. He wouldn’t have to leave his home.
Simply no teams interested? Who knows? He certainly does Florida a solid if they would have encountered difficulty in moving him.