Proposed rule changes in GM meetings

[dumbdick]

Playoff match-ups should be determined by team selection.

Top seeded team chooses their opponent first, and so on.

If you pull off an upset, you steal that teams selection priority for the next round. So if the 8th seeded team beats 1st seeded team in round 1, they pick their opponent first for round 2.

 

[tarheelhockey]

Anything factual that can be reviewed should be reviewed.

If the reviews are too slow, make them faster.

Review every single play after every single whistle to ensure that nothing was missed.

If anything was missed, it must be called during the stoppage and the clock rewound to the point at which the infraction took place.

Sure, games will take 7 hours. But that’s a lot more time for commercials!

 

[gstommylee]

Playoff match-ups should be determined by team selection.

Top seeded team chooses their opponent first, and so on.

If you pull off an upset, you steal that teams selection priority for the next round. So if the 8th seeded team beats 1st seeded team in round 1, they pick their opponent first for round 2.

That is never going to happen ever... It just creates boring matches.

 

[Barrie22]

NHL fans "how can a ref make that call, they should be fired for making such a bad call on the ice"

NHL"ok here is a rule that makes those quick easy to miss details less of an issue for teams to overcome"

NHL fans " no no no, less reviews we like when the refs make those bad calls"

 

[BruinsFan37]

I absolutely hate the puck over the glass as a penalty rule. It should be treated as an icing, no line changes allowed for the team that throws the puck out.

Yes! Though I would add to the rulebook just for completionist sake, that the rule applies even when shorthanded.