Proposed rule changes in GM meetings

[MMC]

Click to read more...

 

[Frank the Tank]

 

[Peasy]

Huge changes.

 

[klefbombs shoulder]

We really need faceoffs to take longer.

 

[LemonSauceD]

Maybe just drop the f***ing puck.

 

[MMC]

 

[MMC]

 

[MMC]

 

[DearDiary]

They spend hours discussing faceoffs yet have done nothing to address the circus that is the Michigan goal

 

[MMC]

 

[Satans Hockey]

I absolutely hate the puck over the glass as a penalty rule. It should be treated as an icing, no line changes allowed for the team that throws the puck out.

 

[The Crypto Guy]

Warmup for a goalie who comes in cold if a goalie is pulled by the spotter? Hopefully that doesn't pass. Just a waste of time. Goalies never needed a warmup before, this just delays the game to get the goalie back with less play off the clock.

 

[MMC]

 

[Voight]

They spend hours discussing faceoffs yet have done nothing to address the circus that is the Michigan goal

What exactly if your problem with it?

 

[MMC]

 

[Super Cake]

So a puck over the glass challenger or a high sticking challenge can turn into a 5 on 3 for the other team if you lose the challenge? Damn

 

[MikeyMike01]

So a puck over the glass challenger or a high sticking challenge can turn into a 5 on 3 for the other team if you lose the challenge? Damn

I’m assuming it’s 2 minutes for the original penalty + 2 minutes for the failed challenge

 

[HockeyGuy1964]

They need to change the puck over glass to be that the puck needs to be on or very close to the ice when contacted.

 

[Tony Romo]

BOOOOOO, add letting the top seeds choose the opponents in the playoffs as well!

 

[HockeyGuy1964]

I’m assuming it’s 2 minutes for the original penalty + 2 minutes for the failed challenge

So a 5 on 3 like the guy you quoted said.

 

[ToDavid]

Could goalies not always be penalized for intentionally disloging the nets? The rule says "any player".

Or do they simply mean they're updating the wording of the rule to make it explicit that it includes both skaters and goalies, to avoid any confusion, not that the rule is actually changing.

 

[OgeeOgelthorpe]

I absolutely hate the puck over the glass as a penalty rule. It should be treated as an icing, no line changes allowed for the team that throws the puck out.

The reason for this is because slugs were shooting the puck over the glass all the time during the DPE with the intention of killing play. It’s a good rule to keep.

 

[Satans Hockey]

The reason for this is because slugs were shooting the puck over the glass all the time during the DPE with the intention of killing play. It’s a good rule to keep.

I would be fine with keeping it and determining intention but that's just gonna waste more time currently. I still think it should be treated a just an icing. Players trying to chip the puck off the glass and missing shouldn't be a penalty.

This league absolutely loves changing things so I'm sure we'll see it gone eventually.

I want VAR put in and get rid of the stupid double reviews. We just had a double review in our last game, was reviewed to see if the puck was locked in, it wasn't, then challenged for goaltender interference. So 2 reviews on the same play. They need to stop wasting everyone's time and just review all goals. If they can't determine if it's a goal or not in under 1 min then the play on the ice stands.

 

[cowboy82nd]

We really need faceoffs to take longer.

I don't think there should be any warning. Delay of the game penalty.

 

[Obvious Fabertism]

I like the delay of game and high sticking reviews, due to the 5v3 potential these are only going to be tried when they are clearly the wrong original call.