mrmyheadhurts
Registered Boozer
Back to the infirmary.
Previous threads
Last edited by a moderator:
Can't even get a read on the guy because of how little he's been in the lineup.
Say what you will of him, I just hope he doesn't become a Ballard, and by that I don't mean a bad player for us, just a guy that was relatively healthy his entire career until he came to us, then had freak and weird injuries for the rest of his career.
Can't even get a read on the guy because of how little he's been in the lineup.
Say what you will of him, I just hope he doesn't become a Ballard, and by that I don't mean a bad player for us, just a guy that was relatively healthy his entire career until he came to us, then had freak and weird injuries for the rest of his career.
Yeah, but what if he stayed healthy and scored 25 goals, then we'd have to pay him almost 4.5 million.This is why you don't sign a player before he plays a single game for you. The guy has been injured over half the year, could have got us a nice discount (well a GM capable of skilled negotiating could).
Really cruddy the way Sutter's tenure here has started off injury-wise. So frustrating that we seem to take these generally healthy players, and turn them into injury magnets in Vancouver. I mean...that injury last night, that's just bad dumb luck. Sucks.
Ballard had hip surgery before ever joining the Canucks. He was still recovering when we traded for him. Gillis swapped a 1st round pick and a former 1st round draftee for what amounted to damaged goods.
You're right that Sutter was by and large healthy before this year.
Yeah, but what if he stayed healthy and scored 25 goals, then we'd have to pay him almost 4.5 million.
what from his 500+ games makes you think that was likely? We paid him on the high end. It would have always most likely been less.
This is why you don't sign a player before he plays a single game for you. The guy has been injured over half the year, could have got us a nice discount (well a GM capable of skilled negotiating could).
Too bad. Not that it really makes much difference to the lineup, they were essentially using him as a non-effective scoring center anyways. Hopefully this allows McCann to see more icetime but apparently Cracknell is playing instead?
That's their point. Best case scenario he scores 25, at which point he still could have been easily had for 4.5. Our lovely management group signed him for that anyways.
Yikes!...did you have to remind us that Sutter's $4.5m deal cuts in next season?...but looking at it positively if he's jinxed injury-wise, at least they'll be more cap relief on LTIR...and if the Canucks are set in the middle with Henrik, Bo and McCann then he instantly becomes the most expensive fourth-line centre in hockey.
McCann can't even beat out waivers guys like Cracknell or Vey, he has a long way to go to pass Sutter. Used properly Sutter is a good bottom 6.
It's a shame that people will resort to pointing to his injuries to explain why he hasn't performed well, while completely ignoring his historical numbers which are similar.
Hoping for a full and speedy recovery though. Don't like to see anyone get hurt.
How has he not performed well? He's basically paced for a 20 goal, 35 pt year, with decent defense, decent faceoffs, a better possession player than he was touted as, a better forechecker than he was touted as, with the same lack of creativity and offensive IQ that he was touted as. Unless people were expecting 50+ points, he's basically performed how he should.