PL Finale: Matchweek 38

YNWA14

Onbreekbaar
Dec 29, 2010
34,543
2,560
People get it from the obvious, like Fulham and Boro being in European finals. That would seem like good criteria to me.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. I think you're speaking about relativity which is completely different than the actual quality.
 

les Habs

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
22,286
3,980
Wisconsin
I’m biased but United’s 08 season and team were better. League title and CL title. Unbeaten in the CL start to finish. Beat good Lyon, Barca and Roma teams on the way to the final.

That Barça wasn't that good. Completely mismanaged at that point. Had Guardiola been manager to start that season you wouldn't have knocked us out.

From someone whose three preferred teams in England are Arsenal, Tottenham and Everton I have to agree. Chelsea had a very good team that year too and it wasn't a fluke to see an all-EPL final. Hard to imagine that happening nowadays.

:facepalm:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fro

Stray Wasp

Registered User
May 5, 2009
4,561
1,503
South east London
I think the notion that today's mid to bottom table teams are worse than the ones 10 years ago is silly. They're not worse. The top end teams are probably better overall, which creates a bigger gap, but these teams are definitely not worse. Look at the roster of Stoke for example and compare it to some of the mid table teams of the past. Coaching is becoming more and more important, too.

I have looked at Stoke's roster. What I see is a team lacking energy in central midfield, short of creativity out wide and without any goal scorers. The biggest individual talent is a bloke notorious for being temperamental.

Coaching certainly helped sink them, but a team with the weaknesses outlined above would be rotten in any era.

In 2007-8, the team that finished 11th had Dimitar Berbatov up front. Not sure what that proves.
 

YNWA14

Onbreekbaar
Dec 29, 2010
34,543
2,560
True enough. As with most sports and athletics the teams and players of yesteryear are almost certainly better than those of the present, and likely future. Especially since developments in sports on and off the field have grinded to a screeching halt and where sports were once for men and heroes they are now populated by whiny-boys and primadonnas.
 

East Coast Bias

Registered User
Feb 28, 2014
8,362
6,422
NYC
From someone whose three preferred teams in England are Arsenal, Tottenham and Everton I have to agree. Chelsea had a very good team that year too and it wasn't a fluke to see an all-EPL final. Hard to imagine that happening nowadays.

It was an all EPL final. United won on penalties in Moscow. That Chelsea team in 08 was damn good. United beat in the league by 2 points also.
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
37,093
10,745
It was an all EPL final. United won on penalties in Moscow. That Chelsea team in 08 was damn good. United beat in the league by 2 points also.
That year England had 3 teams in the semis too. Chelsea beat Liverpool after an insane two legs that went to Extra Time.
 

The Abusement Park

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2016
34,246
25,458
That year England had 3 teams in the semis too. Chelsea beat Liverpool after an insane two legs that went to Extra Time.

When England actually had good coaching and teams that played like teams instead of individuals brought in for their marketability.

I think the biggest issue nowadays with English teams is that they have been they haven’t built teams, just assembling talented players that don’t mesh well. And clearly City and Liverpool have finally changed that and are looking very promising going forward.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad