Has Embiid been cleared to play 5 on 5 yet
Well Luka Doncic looks like he is still in the lead for #1 overall next year....dude is a gamer. Would be amazing if somehow we lucked out and the pick we gave the Celtics becomes #1. Our pick should not be a lottery pick this year if we make the playoffs. Obviously, the Cavs are banking on that Nets pick from the Celtics..especially if LeBron leaves
Jahlil Okafor’s days as a 76er have been numbered since his rookie season, so it’s not surprising that the Sixers talk openly about their intent to resume trade decisions involving the third-year veteran.
“Bryan’s going to do his job,†coach Brett Brown said of team president Bryan Colangelo, who is looking for a trade partner. “I’m going to coach him, and we are going to see what goes on with the rest of the league in relation to whatever else is out there.
“But I’m coaching him like he’s mine.â€
He’ll continue to do that until the 21-year-old is no longer on the roster.
“I am excited to coach him until somebody tells me that I’m not,†Brown said.
Okafor will get “every opportunity to earn playing time,†Brown said. Right now, Okafor is competing with Richaun Holmes and free-agent signee Amir Johnson for the backup center position.
Joel Embiid, the standout starter, has not been cleared for 5-on-5 scrimmages with training camp starting Tuesday. The Sixers said there was no timetable for his return. As a result, expect Okafor, if healthy, to get a lot of playing time in the preseason to showcase his skills to potential trading partners.
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports...yan-colangelo-trade-possibility-20170921.html
I think Okafor is a legit NBA center, hopefully he finds a good fit somewhere. At this point I don't much care what they get for him, a 2nd round pick? That would be fine with me.
On another note, this is an unusually positive (for Philly media) piece on Simmons:
In Simmons, Sixers sound like they have something special brewing
I think Simmons even more than Embiid is the key to the Sixers future. He's going to drive the offense and with his athleticism on defense and rebounding he can be an impact player all over the floor.
That's a pretty terrible opinion.
really? did you watch him at lsu? Yeah a 6'10 freak with ballhandling abilities got to the rim at will, couldn't finish with both hands and teams played off him about 5 feet. Unless this guy is the 2nd coming of charles barkley, i have a hard time seeing him being a guy that is an efficient scorer.
Did you watch him in summer league? He did not score. He averaged like 8 pts a game.
Summer league is a joke, but lebron was the exact same way
If you want to make the lebron comparison , i will give you a comparison from the opposite spectrum.
Michael Beasley. Beasley dominated in college. 25-12 shot great from 3, and got to the line. Comes to the nba where he can't get by on his athletic gifts and struggles to play the game. Is not 4 , and can't stretch the d to be a 3. he did not fit in with the nba .
What happens to simmonds if he is not a good scorer?
Why is everyone so convinced he will be an effective scorer i the nba?
Can someone please answer these 2 questions for me?
I'm not at all convinced Simmons will be a great scorer, but I don't understand why you're comping a bedknob to a broomstick. You're picking a guy who only has to be a functional scorer to be great and comparing him to a guy whose primary value was putting up points.
First and foremost, Beasley was a ball stopper who could shoot pretty well for a 4. Beasley was undersized in a league that was far more about size and nastiness than it is today who, while a good athlete, was much less so than you might think off the hop and who lacked the awareness necessary for NBA defense. This is partially how he lost the ability to rebound up a level, as he was consistently out of position.
He was also a terrible distributor who didn't have and didn't care about acquiring the polish necessary to draw a double in the post. Hell, one of his biggest weaknesses in the NBA was how often he would take a pull up after penetrating, but he was actually pretty productive off the dribble going left early in his career even though it was common knowledge he couldn't go to his right.
If you want to make the lebron comparison , i will give you a comparison from the opposite spectrum.
Michael Beasley. Beasley dominated in college. 25-12 shot great from 3, and got to the line. Comes to the nba where he can't get by on his athletic gifts and struggles to play the game. Is not 4 , and can't stretch the d to be a 3. he did not fit in with the nba .
What happens to simmonds if he is not a good scorer?
Why is everyone so convinced he will be an effective scorer i the nba?
Can someone please answer these 2 questions for me?
Beasley v Simmons comp seems pretty off, coming from a casual fan. Different body types, but more importantly vastly different playing styles and further, strengths/weaknesses. While I would be weary of the Lebron comparison, it seems to be slightly more viable based on athleticism for athletes of that size. Both need to develop jumpers coming into the NBA, but it appears Simmons passing ability is far ahead LBJs at that time (maybe even today) but Simmons's shot is far more broken and needing work. Just my .02 though, can't wait to see him play. I remember the feeling when I heard he got hurt last year...