The septic tank is on.
The septic tank is on.
The 2014 and 2016 drafts look to be pretty bad though, especially considering the players that went off the board after our picks. Fleury and Bean are looking less and less like the impact D-men they were sold as, and Gauthier basically has a long ways to go to even be a bottom 6 player in the NHL. I still think both Fleury and Bean can be NHLers, but probably not top pairing d-men. Maybe second pairing specialists (PP for Bean and PK for Fleury).But his first round drafting has not been that bad.
We had to draft D for the first 2 years, Fleury seems decent, he can still grow and Hanifin has a lot of potential, he just have to keep playing and these 2 were ranked above others, so they are decent picks IMO. When we picked Bean he was best one available at that moment, but maybe he needed to do something differently. And last years pick - Necas - seems to be a steal. So I would say he drafted solid 7/10 in the first round considering all of the variables IMO.
Of course, only draft we can somehow really judge right now is 2014 when we picked Fleury, but looking back at it, Fleury seems like the best choice there, I can't see any D guy better than him at this moment from the first round. And we had to take a D guy there.The 2014 and 2016 drafts look to be pretty bad though, especially considering the players that went off the board after our picks. Fleury and Bean are looking less and less like the impact D-men they were sold as, and Gauthier basically has a long ways to go to even be a bottom 6 player in the NHL. I still think both Fleury and Bean can be NHLers, but probably not top pairing d-men. Maybe second pairing specialists (PP for Bean and PK for Fleury).
Hanfin it's hard to blame him on as he was the consensus #1 d-man by most teams, the only thing I can fault him on is bringing him to the NHL right away.
Necas still remains to be seen. While I'm excited for him, I'm going to remain very cautious. I thought Lindholm was a sure thing to be a franchise player once too.
Pure art, thank you!
I didn't watch it
But I felt it
In my empty soul
Experience Canes Hockey
Seek GM candidates & Destroy their careers
I wasn't aware I was supposed to do a haiku.You messed up that haiku like the Canes messed up the season.
Or they just suck...There are a lot of guys on this team that have only played for Kirk Muller or Bill Peters. Part of me says "These guys were bad picks." Another part wonders "What if they had a chance to develop under a coach/org that knows how to develop players?"
I often wondered if some of our development issues stem from Pete Friesen (I know he's gone now but isn't his replacement one of his underlings) and his oddball dietary and workout systems.
They/he used to always talk about having thinner, lean players to develop speed.
Look at a team like the Jets, who seem to completely manhandle and physically dominate the Hurricanes, as most teams in the league do. Our guys just don't have the strength to compete in front of the net.
It makes me wonder if their physical development (muscle) has been sacrificed because management has some theory about searching for speed. Most of our players aren't good enough to compete on speed and skill alone. Lindholm for example should probably be a quite a bit heavier than he currently is, same for Hannifin, who still has time to develop physically.
I've often thought our prospects havent reached their potential due to: A. Being rushed.
And
B. Someone convinced someone else that the way to win in the new NHL is with super fit trim players, sacrifice some strength to gain an insignificant amount of speed.
I call it the Derek Ryan, program. And what it does is create $h!t hockey players that aren't strong enough to compete inside the dots where most goals are scored in the NHL.
Who needs muscle when your super fit and trim hockey men are going to littelary fly around the ice? (We do, we definitely need some muscle)
Can we just get rid of the 3rd period?
Or he did the best he could with smaller players. Waste time trying to bulk up or emphasize the strengths of small, quick and flexible.I have long thought the same thing.
The “system/coach” has become the new Chad Larose.Thread review:
- If the players make bad decisions with the puck and it leads to something bad, it's the fault of the system/coach.
- If the players aren't where they are supposed to be and it leads to something bad, it's the fault of the system/coach.
- If the players are where they are supposed to be and it leads to something bad, it's the fault of the system/coach.
Or he did the best he could with smaller players. Waste time trying to bulk up or emphasize the strengths of small, quick and flexible.
We sorely lack bigger players. We couldn’t add size AND skill so we added skill in this most recent version. TT, Aho, Lindy, Skinner, Ryan, Williams, Stempniak are all leaner and/or smaller.
Rask and Nordstrom could carry more weight, but I don’t know who else could really benefit from a change away to bulkier.