Confirmed with Link: Petr Mrazek signed 1 year, 1.5M

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
Seriously no. Why? What sense did that make? We can scout him just as good playing for other teams.

I agree he has the highest ceiling because he still has a little unknown about him. I like him more than Lehner, and I’m glad it’s only one year. And cheap. I’m also glad we didn’t waste a Skinner or Faulk trade on a desperation goalie trade.

Now we get a full trial year instead of a trial quarter-season. Could blow up just as bad or work just as well. But it seems like a question better answered on a wasted season then the entirety of next year.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,419
139,447
Bojangles Parking Lot
is this a joke lol. cam ward is 34 and has been bad for six years straight. even at $1.5m i wouldn't have brought him back. at least there may be some upside here.

Cam Ward is a backup.

Petr Mrazek is a slow start away from the AHL.

“There may be some upside” is what you do when the other guy isn’t Scott Darling.

This was a weak, money-driven move.
 

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
40,945
20,594
I'm really disappointed, such a risky decision.

He's been a mess the last few seasons, which is exactly what Carolina doesn't need. Have to just hope he still finds his potential from few years ago, he's young, atleast.
 

Anton Babchuk

Registered User
Nov 3, 2005
12,913
2,438
Raleigh-Durham
twitter.com
Cam Ward is a backup.

Petr Mrazek is a slow start away from the AHL.

“There may be some upside” is what you do when the other guy isn’t Scott Darling.

This was a weak, money-driven move.
what is this based on, exactly? how do you know there was even any attempt to sign him? they could have very easily determined that cam ward isn't a starter caliber and decided to move on, because going with the exact same goalie tandem that failed us last year isn't a good idea. darling bouncing back is a huge question mark, and cam ward pretty much is guaranteed not to be more than a decent back-up.
 

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
Cam Ward is a backup.

Petr Mrazek is a slow start away from the AHL.

“There may be some upside” is what you do when the other guy isn’t Scott Darling.

This was a weak, money-driven move.

This is the hard truth. Canes let Camk walk to save $1.5 million.

Picture game 10 of the season. Mrazek and Darling both are 1-4 and look like ass. The Canes are f***ed and I’d give this outcome 50/50 odds.
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
24,182
39,808
colorado
Visit site
Now we get a full trial year instead of a trial quarter-season. Could blow up just as bad or work just as well. But it seems like a question better answered on a wasted season then the entirety of next year.
We would’ve given desperately needed assets when we had no chance. That move would’ve have been a tryout, it would’ve been a make the playoffs move and when it failed it would’ve been hung on him too. And it probably would’ve costed more to resign him to stay rather than save him in UFA like we just did.

Rf didn’t think it was worth paying deadline prices for help. The owner agreed. The local media agreed. Most of us agreed. I respect you holding onto to your opinion, I do it too. I’m just not seeing this as failed mistake in the past.

I do think this was the only kind of situation Mrazek could make it in. Duller spotlight, extended time to work through his issues, here from camp so he can build some momentum. I like him to be honest. If it was Ward and Mrazek I’d actually be mildly optimistic.
 

What the Faulk

You'll know when you go
May 30, 2005
42,121
3,851
North Carolina
This is the hard truth. Canes let Camk walk to save $1.5 million.

Picture game 10 of the season. Mrazek and Darling both are 1-4 and look like ass. The Canes are ****ed and I’d give this outcome 50/50 odds.

At least $1.5m isn't a ton of money, and it's only for one year. If your scenario comes true, they could always go looking for someone else, or just say f*** it and bring in Ned. A bit harder to do that if both guys are making 3M+ (though I would imagine Cam would have stayed here for less).
 

Chrispy

Salakuljettaja's Blues
Feb 25, 2009
8,410
27,125
Cary, NC
Cam Ward is a backup.

Petr Mrazek is a slow start away from the AHL.

“There may be some upside” is what you do when the other guy isn’t Scott Darling.

This was a weak, money-driven move.

In part I'll agree this was money driven. In that they will feel better burying 1.5M in Charlotte if needed. And no one could bury Ward in Charlotte.

At 1.5M I feel like there could still be another acquisition. But that's me being overly optimistic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unsustainable

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
But surely this isn’t good right? There is no chance that Mrazek was a desirable option for the Canes when they passed on him for basically free last year at their most needy.
 

The Faulker 27

Registered User
Nov 15, 2011
13,094
48,261
Sauna-Aho
I do think this was the only kind of situation Mrazek could make it in. Duller spotlight, extended time to work through his issues, here from camp so he can build some momentum. I like him to be honest. If it was Ward and Mrazek I’d actually be mildly optimistic.

Carolina is becoming the treatment center for crazy Goalies. Great.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad