That is literally the case for every coach in the world... You will never agree fully with any individual on this planet. That doesn't necessarily mean your point is better than the other person and that you are warranted in attacking that person. One thing we do know is that he has more data then you do in order to make his decisions and that he has been doing it professionally for a very long time. I don't understand which of your qualifications would trump that and make you the more rational person.
Yes I am only limited to public data.
If there is some major discrepancy between the publically available data and the data he has, then he should explain what it is because it's completely impossible to see the rationale behind it from the data we have.
I do not blindly trust his ability to be rational when his actions speak against what is rational. That is why I question him.
Asking me to just take Maurices mystic reasoning over the common sense one, due to his position as a coach, is a completely foreign idea to me. No I do not trust his intellect until he shows me why I should. He isn't showing it. Maybe he will. Time will tell. Maybe tomorrow he comes out with some data that completely contradict the publically available stuff. Or maybe he comes out and says "yeah Mark's been playing well with Blake, we are doing ok in standings" as usual.