Whether the team quit on the coach or not doesn't really matter much. Personally I think we actually played pretty decently throughout the slump in the games that I saw.Conspiracy theory replacement: They did give up on the coach but Bergevin had a talk with them and said coach was safe. As such players have no choice. Don't worry though, behind the scenes players will be asking MB for a trade.
Whether the team quit on the coach or not doesn't really matter much. Personally I think we actually played pretty decently throughout the slump in the games that I saw.
It doesn't change the fact though that we've got a bad coach and should replace him.
Rightly or wrongly, coaches are often used as a quick-fix for slumping teams, like buying new clothes to address depression. Luckily for the Habs, they'll get the same psychological boost once Gallagher and Price come back. Without those injuries, Therrien would probably have been sacrificed already. Of course, without injuries we probably wouldn't be in this slump.
Goes to the main point about 90% of this drama being mental. Montreal has been a demoralized, frustrated, unlucky team. That mindset could become chronic and kill a season, as it has with Anaheim and Columbus, but the effect of our star goalie and biggest pest returning will have a bigger impact than the sum of their talent. Our players need to look back and see Price holding the fort.
Another thing last night proved as that scratching Andrighetto was a huge mistake. He was scoring and in his first game back he gets an assist. Hopefully Therrien finally realizes to score you need some players with offensive upside and not just player who can grind, I'm not holding my breath on that though.
Ghetto and Carr have been really nice surprises so far. I'd rather them than Byron but Byron is a good penalty killer. I think Ghetto get's sent back unfortunately as Carr has been like another Gallagher for us during this slump.
On another note, Barberio was pretty solid last night. I like him and Pateryn together as Barberio is offensive while Pateryn is the big stay at home guy. Hope they give it another shot.
Ghetto and Carr have been really nice surprises so far. I'd rather them than Byron but Byron is a good penalty killer.
Keep Ghetto up when Gally gets back and just move Weise down to the 4th line / scratch Flynn.
Pac-Pleks-Gally
Eller-Galchenyuk-Carr / Ghetto
Flash-DD-Ghetto / Carr
Byron-Mitchell-Weise.
Ghetto>Weise>Flynn.
Never going to happen with Therrien but that's what he should do IMO.
Without Price it feels like we're right back in the middle of the Koivu era.
Rightly or wrongly, coaches are often used as a quick-fix for slumping teams, like buying new clothes to address depression. Luckily for the Habs, they'll get the same psychological boost once Gallagher and Price come back. Without those injuries, Therrien would probably have been sacrificed already. Of course, without injuries we probably wouldn't be in this slump.
Goes to the main point about 90% of this drama being mental. Montreal has been a demoralized, frustrated, unlucky team. That mindset could become chronic and kill a season, as it has with Anaheim and Columbus, but the effect of our star goalie and biggest pest returning will have a bigger impact than the sum of their talent. Our players need to look back and see Price holding the fort.
We have many good pkers. Eller, Plekanec, Patch, Flynn, Mitchell. Being good in that role should not land you a top 9 spot. 4th line okay but anything over that should be a no no even with injuries. Byron is a 20 points not so great defensively at 5 on 5 small player. He is like the 5'6 version of Eller. We should never see him outside of the 4th line / pker role. I mean more than half his points and goals were made on the pk ... that something i've never seen from a guy playing 13 minutes. You must not only be good on the pk you must **** at 5 on 5 too.
There's absolutely no doubt in my mind that if you need a top 9 player Carr and Ghetto are better option than Byron.
You realize many teams don't play 3 1st liners on the 1st line right?
In Anaheim they played Getzlaf, Perry and whoever they could find last year.
Of course, Getzlaf and Perry are elite players, no question but Pacioretty+Gallagher and having say Eller/DD or whatever middle 6 in there for a short stint is fine. Again though, their play needs to justify the minutes.
In Chicago they don't even play Kane and Toews on same line. In fact Andrew Shaw(on pace for 31 points) played along side Toews for 127:15 5 on 5 this year. DD played with max 54:04 under same conditions.
Yah, so relax. Stop speaking in absolutes, every coach does this. Even guys like Quenneville.
The funniest part of this is you suggested putting Semin on top line RW over Gallagher "because it might help". Semin was on a cold streak whereas I say it's okay if DD is on a hot streak.
I mean, c'mon, playing a guy if he earned it isn't a big deal. I feel same way about Galchenyuk who I've said should be rewarded for his good play. Whether or not MT is consistent isn't my fault nor does it change my opinion. Teams regularly add complimentary players on top lines all the time.
Hell, this year Cameron took Hoffman, their leading point producing and goal scoring forward off the top line to put a grinder on top line. Who was it, Dziurzynski maybe?
It happens all the time, whether you want to play in absolutes or not.
Again, to conclude: If it is not warranted or with good reason, it should not happen.
If Beaulieu had 8 points in last 8 GP +8 let's say and Markov was 0s across the board with a -8 rating during that time. Would it be wrong for management to entertain putting Beaulieu along Subban for a short period of time?
Using Gilbert as an example is far fetched, I never said Mitchell. We're talking about middle pairing/middle 6 guys being moved a line up or down. It's certainly not the travesty people are making it out to be.
Happens all the time.
All Im saying is DD has an offensive upside. The reason why we use him too much is because we lack more offence. Why is that so bloody ****ing hard to understand ?
Because you're wrong. I have proven to you how you're wrong using FACTS. You have chosen to ignore those facts and just keep repeating the same trash just because ''you watch every game and DD wowed you more''. That's your freaking argument ''you were wowed'' more by DD over the years.
That's not a freaking argument. You dare call other posters here biased after?..You're funny.
DD is our 3rd best center and he's used with our best winger. Jeez....I wonder why we lack offense
Funny, when he was used as a 3rd line center this year we didn't seem to lack any offense. Matter of fact, we were the best in the NHL. God knows how much you love facts though..
I'm too lazy to double check, but I'm pretty sure Plekanec wasn't in a defensive role in his 69 point season.
Defending the team creates attacks from the shielded haters then the wrong answer get u infracted. I feel ur pain.
I don't disagree with any of this.Rightly or wrongly, coaches are often used as a quick-fix for slumping teams, like buying new clothes to address depression. Luckily for the Habs, they'll get the same psychological boost once Gallagher and Price come back. Without those injuries, Therrien would probably have been sacrificed already. Of course, without injuries we probably wouldn't be in this slump.
Goes to the main point about 90% of this drama being mental. Montreal has been a demoralized, frustrated, unlucky team. That mindset could become chronic and kill a season, as it has with Anaheim and Columbus, but the effect of our star goalie and biggest pest returning will have a bigger impact than the sum of their talent. Our players need to look back and see Price holding the fort.
I don't disagree with any of this.
But it's beside the point. Many people who wanted the coach fired over the course of this slump wanted him fired not because of the slump itself. We wanted him fired because he's simply a bad coach. Galchenyuk's use is inexplicable. We've gone back to DD on the first... AGAIN. Ghetto has been out of the lineup despite playing well and this coach makes adjustments for the worse.
He's better than he was last year but it doesn't make him a good coach. Galchenyuk's simply the most stark example of how bad a coach he is. 14 mins a game... at what point do we just admit that this guy has no idea what he's doing?
Dude, even you disagreed with him. He claims DD is an elite NHL player and that he's our best offensive center. He's 100% wrong, spare me the victim line.
Defending the team rightfully or wrongfully get you attacked from the negative crowd
it is a fact even if he wasnt wrong.
Defending the team rightfully or wrongfully get you attacked from the negative crowd
it is a fact even if he wasnt wrong.